Back
M. N. VENKATACHALIAH, K. RAMASWAMY
Sukalu Ram Gond – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent
(1) THE petitioner has challenged the order dated 13/7/1990 of the High court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Misc. Cri. Case No. 1054 of 1990 passed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 quashing the proceedings of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Dharntari, dated 7/9/1989 in Cri. Case No. 943 of 1989 registered under Section 397 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code. While Special Leave Petition (Cri.) No. 1971 of 1990 is pending, by consent of parties, this court on 1/8/1991 made a reference to Justice Shiv Dayal (retired chief justice of the Madhya Pradesh High court and a Sr. Adv. of this Bar) to adjudicate the disputes thus :
may be appointed as an Arbitrator, by consent, to go into the question as to the amounts due, if any, by the petitioner to the second respondent or vice versa, in respect of Truck No. MKS 931 1."
(The other clauses of reference are not material, hence omitted).
(2) THE Arbitrator entered upon the reference within the time and gave his award on 31/12/1992 holding thus :
"FINAL answer to the reference is Anoop Chand (Respondent 5 in the SLP) shall pay to Sukalu Ram and Basant Kumar (Partnership) or to Ba
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
