SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 202

A. M. AHMADI, N. P. SINGH, S. MOHAN
Voltas LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
D.N.Mishra, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

Judgment

N.P. SINGH, J.

(1) THESE appeals have been filed under Section 55 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade PRACTICES Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as " "the Act") against the judgment and order of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade PRACTICES Commission (hereinafter referred to as "the Commission").

(2) THE appellant had entered into agreements with large number of companies, who are respondents in different appeals, in respect of distribution of different machineries and equipments within different territories of India. The companies, who are respondents to the different appeals, have been manufacturing different types of machines and instruments, which under the terms of the agreements are to be distributed by the appellant as the Marketing Company. The appellant has been appointed as buyer (sole importer) on the terms and conditions mentioned in different agreements.

(3) ON 26/11/1986, notices were issued under Section 10(a)(iii) read with Section 37 of the Act, informing the appellant that the agreements between the appellant and the different companies, some of which have their head offices in foreign countries contain condition








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top