MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, V.S.SIRPURKAR
Md. Alauddin Khan – Appellant
Versus
Karam Thamarjit Singh – Respondent
Judgment :
V. S. SIRPURKAR, J.
1. I have had the benefit of the opinion expressed by my brother. Since the facts in this appeal have been meticulously put in that judgment, I need not restate them. It is held in that judgment that the order passed by the Learned Single Judge deleting paragraphs 22 to 31 from the written statement of the elected candidate in pursuance of the application filed by the election petitioner under Order VI Rule 16, Code of Civil Procedure is correct. With deepest respect to my brother, I find myself unable to agree with the view taken, as also the ultimate order passed in pursuance of that view. In my opinion, the Learned Designated Election Judge was not right in striking out those paragraphs and the application made by the election petitioner under Order VI Rule 16, CPC was liable to be dismissed.
2. The election petitioner was a losing candidate and he had lost his election by merely two votes. In the election petition, the following prayers were made:
"....................
(iii) to order a re-count of the votes after excluding the void votes if required;
(iv) to declare the election of the Respondent No.1 as void;
(v) to pass other and further orders a
Virendra Kumar Saklecha v. Jagjiwan
Dr. Rajendra Kumari Bajpai v. Ram Adhar Yadav
Dr. Rajendra Kumari Bajpai v. Ram Adhar Yadav
Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab
Inayatullah Khan v. Diwanchand Mahajan
N.Gopal Reddy v. Bonala Krishnamurthy
Arun Kumar Bose v. Mohd. Furkan Ansari
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.