SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1554

R. V. RAVEENDRAN, K. G. BALAKRISHNAN
MAHMADHUSEN ABDULRAHIM KALOTA SHAIKH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


K. G. BALAKRISHNAN, CJI.

( 1 ) LEAVE granted in SLP (Crl.) No. 3015-3016/2005. The appellants in these two a Prevention of Terrorism (Second) Ordinance, 2001 ppeals are the kith and kin of some persons killed in the Godhra Train Burning incident and in the akshardham Temple attack. They2 have challenged the judgment dated 13. 4. 2005 of the Gujarat High Court in SCA nos. 1103 and 1105/2005 filed by them. For convenience, the appellants in these two appeals will be referred to as the `relatives of victims'.

( 2 ) THE appellants in Criminal Appeal Nos. 1113/2005, 1498-1500/2005, 359/2006, 734/2007, 735/2007 and 736/2007 are persons who have been charged in respect of offences under the provisions of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002, in terrorism related cases. In these appeals, they have also challenged the said judgment dated 13. 4. 2005 of the Gujarat High Court in SCA nos. 1103 and 1105 of 2005, and other judgments of the said High court and the judgment of the Bombay High Court which follow the said decision. The appellants in these appeals will be referred to as `pota accused'.

( 3 ) THESE appeals involve questions relating to the constitutional validity as also the interpr

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top