MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, ANIL R.DAVE
Jaipur Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Mahesh Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J.
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8590 OF 2003
1. We propose to dispose of these appeals together since the issues in these matters are interconnected.
2. A narration of the facts leading to the filing of the present appeal would indicate as to how money and land of the Government has been squandered away by some of the Government officials of Jaipur by joining hand with certain private parties. The facts of the present case would also reflect how unscrupulous and adventurous people in connivance with bureaucrats and persons in power have not only sought to give undue advantage of giving compensation for land but also sought to grab valuable lands causing willful loss to the Government exchequer and gain unto themselves. Facts of the present case appropriately reflects the earlier observations of this court in Secy., Jaipur Development Authority v. Daulat Mal Jain, reported at (1997) 1 SCC 35 wherein it was stated that public policy cannot be a camouflage for abuse of power and trust entrusted with a public authority or public servant for the performance of public duty and an illegal allotment of land founded upon ultra vires and illegal policy of allotment made to
Secy., Jaipur Development Authority v. Daulat Mal Jain
Jaipur Development Authority v. Radhey Shyam
Narpat Singh v. Jaipur Development Authority
State of Orissa v. Brundaban Sharma
Meher Rusi Dalal v. Union of India
Collector of Bombay v. Nusserwanji Rattanji Mistri
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.