SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 1005

B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, K. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, SWATANTER KUMAR, S. H. KAPADIA
Brij Lal – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: Appearing Parties:Gopal Subramanium, SG, C.S. Aggarwal, Porus F. Kaka, R.P. Bhat, O.S. Bajpai, Sr. Advocates, Rajiv K. Garg, Vivek Verma, Ashish Garg, Vineet Garg, A.D.N. Rao, Preetesh Kapur, G.S. Pikale, E.C. Agarwala, Mahesh Agarwal, Rishi Agrawala, Amit Kumar Sharma, Ms Rohma Hameed, Rajeev Tyagi, Vijay Verma, Chanchal Biswal, Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Balaji Subramanium, Aman Ahuliwalia, B.V. Balaram Das, Subramoium Prasad, Ajay Majithia, Manish Kanth, Rajesh Kumar, Dr. Kailash Chand, Chirag M. Shroff, Dattatray Vyas, Ajay Vohra, Kavita Jha, Amit Sachdeva, Prem Malhotra, Ms. Rachna Gupta, C.S. Jain, Y. Raja Gopala Rao, Krishna, V.N. Jha, V.N. Raghupathy, Ajay Jain, Rajiv Tyagi, R.K. Raghavan, Chanchal Biswal, Manjit Singh, Kamal Mohan Gupta, Santosh Aggarwal, Bhargava V. Desai, Rahul Gupta, Nikhil Sharma, Vivek Verma, Ms. Pallavi Mohan, Pankaj Jain, Abhay Jain, Rakesh Jain, Manish Kr. Choudhary, Namita Chaudhary, S.K. Verma, Mohit Chaudhary, Ashok Kulkarni, Ms. Puja Sharma, A. Das, Rituraj Chaudhary, Advocates.

Judgment :-

S.H. KAPADIA, CJI

1. Leave granted.

2. Vide referral orders dated 14.12.2004 and 20.1.2005 the following questions have been referred to the Constitution Bench of this Court:

(i) Whether sections 234A, 234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short "the Act") are at all applicable to proceedings of the Settlement Commission under Chapter XIX-A of the Act?

(ii) Whether the Settlement Commission can reopen its concluded proceedings by having recourse to section 154 of the Act so as to levy interest under sections 234A, 234B and 234C of the Act, though it was not so done in the original proceedings?

(iii) Whether in the absence of period of limitation prescribed for making the order of the Settlement, the relevant date for determining the quantum of interest could be the date of the said order?

3. For the sake of convenience, after hearing learned counsel on both sides, we reframe the above questions.

(I) Whether section 234B applies to proceedings of the Settlement Commission under Chapter XIX-A of the said Act?

(II) If answer to the above question is in the affirmative, what is the terminal point for levy of such interest - Whether such interest should be computed up to th













































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top