SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 655

Y. K. SABHARWAL, ARIJIT PASAYAT, S. H. KAPADIA
T. N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPAD (103-A) – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


ORDER

IAs Nos. 1595-96 in WP (C) No. 202 of 1995

1. On the request of the learned counsel for the applicant, Ministry of Environment and Forests is impleaded as Respondent 3. Copy of the application has been given to Mr A.D.N. Rao, learned counsel. On behalf of Respondents 1 and 2, Mr J.K. Das, learned counsel, accepts notice.

IA No. 1597 in WP (C) No. 202 of 1995

2. In substance, the application seeks modification of the order dated 24-3-2006. It records the statement of the learned counsel for the applicant, inter alia, to the effect that the applicant, on being informed about the payment of NPV by the Ministry of Environment and Forests, will pay the same and for the balance amount, will give an undertaking.

3. Though the applicant, it is stated, has not been informed about the amount of NPV but from the communication dated 27-3-2006 of the Divisional Forest Officer, it seems that NPV being sought for is Rs 1515.898 lakhs. In view of the peculiar circumstances explained, at present, the applicant may pay rupees thirty crores instead of paying the amount informed by the Ministry of Environment and Forests. To this extent, the order dated 24-3-2006, shall stand modified.

IAsNos.12




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top