SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 1223

K. G. BALAKRISHNAN, AFTAB ALAM, S. H. KAPADIA
T. N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPAD – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


ORDER

IA No. 2143 in WP (C) No. 202 of 1995

1. Pursuant to a series of orders passed by this Court for afforestation purpose, various agencies had deposited amounts by way of net present value (NPV) when the forest area were utilised for non-forest purposes. This amount is lying with the ad hoc CAMPA. The MoEF, the amicus curiae and CEC have discussed the matter and they have come up with a scheme as to how to utilise the deposited amount for the purpose of afforestation.

2. CEC has filed a report framing a scheme and the same has been placed before this Court for consideration. We have examined the scheme and accepted the following recommendations:

(A) The guidelines and the structure of the State CAMPA as prepared by MoEF may be notified/implemented. All previous orders passed by this Court regarding this would stand modified to the extent necessary for c implementation of the present proposal.

(B) Substantial amount of funds have been received by the ad hoc CAMPA and sudden release and utilisation of this large sum all at one time may not be appropriate and may lead to its improper use without any effective control on expenditure. This Court considers it appropriate to permit the a








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top