SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 624

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
G.S. SINGHVI, V. GOPALA GOWDA, JJ.
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others – Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5428 OF 2013 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 3009/2012)
Decided On : 11-07-2013

IMPORTANT POINT
Mandamus cannot be issued in three decades old stale claims.

Headnote:Land Acquisition Act, 1894-Sections 18 and 54-Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971-Section 4(1)-Acquisition of land-Release of acquired land-After 37 years of initiation of acquisition proceedings and 28 years of pronouncement of award by respondent, appellant filed writ petition-Mere fact that file notings do not contain a corresponding entry cannot lead to an inference that senior management of appellant was not aware of High Court's order-Assertion contained in application for condonation of delay that Senior Management did not know of direction given by High Court cannot but be treated as a deliberate attempt to mislead Court and on that ground alone prayer for condonation of delay is liable to be rejected- Appellant is guilty of not coming to Court with clean hands and explanation given by it for 401 days' delay has to be treated as wholly unsatisfactory and the prayer for condonation of delay is liable to be rejected-If appellant had pressed its prayer for issue of a mandamus to official respondents to deliver possession of acquired land after evicting slum dwellers, High Court would have non-suited it on ground of laches-No justification for entertaining prayer for issue of mandamus at this belated stage by ignoring developments which have taken place in intervening period. (Paras 8, 17, 21, 24 to 27)

       Result: Appeal dismissed as barred by time.

       

JUDGMENT

G. S. SINGHVI, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. Feeling dissatisfied with order dated 30.7.2010 read with order dated 13.8.2010 passed by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No.1517/2010 for issue of a mandamus to respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to hand over vacant possession of final Plot bearing No.1088, Town Planning Scheme-IV (City) (Mahim) situated at Kashinath Dhuruwadi, Standard Mill Lane, Rajabhau Desai Marg, New Prabhadevi, Mumbai and for restraining respondent No.5 from carrying out further development on that plot or creating third party rights, the appellant has sought intervention of this Court.

3. By Notification dated 24.9.1973 issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, ‘the Act’) the Government of Maharashtra proposed the acquisition of four plots, Town Planning Scheme as described hereinabove for Posts and Telegraph Offices. After considering the report submitted by the Collector under Section 5A(2), the State Government issued declaration dated 7.11.1975 under Section 6(1) of the Act. The Special Land Acquisition Officer (respondent No.2) passed award dated 31.3.1982 and fixed market value of Plot Nos. 1087 and 1088 as Rs.14,14,282/- and Rs.13,29,897/-, respectively. Assistant Engineer (Phone) (L.A., Mumbai Telephones) deposited the amount of compensation on 9.8.1982.

4. Since some portions of the acquired land were occupied by slum dwellers, respondent No.2 sent letters dated 10.2.1983 and 22.3.1983 to the officers of the Bombay Telephones to rehabilitate the hutment dwellers or pay rehabilitation compensation and deposit the establishment and service charges. Between 9.6.1983 and 3.8.1992 the officers of Bombay Telephones and Posts and Telegraph Department exchanged correspondence inter se and sent communications to Bombay Housing and Area Development Board, Department of Housing and Special Assistance, Government of Maharashtra and other functionaries of the State Government for delivery of possession of the two plots but did not get desired response apparently because more and more persons had encroached and occupied the acquired land. After about 6 years, Deputy General Manager (Planning), Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd., sent letter dated 23.6.1998 to respondent No.2 to either hand over vacant possession of the two plots or refund the amount of compensation with interest. That letter reads as under:

“MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED MUMBAI

O/o Dy. General Manager (Planning)

3rd Flr, Telephone House,

V.S. Marg, Dadar (West),

Mumbai-400 028,

No. PELA-1-166/98-99 Date: 23/6/98


To,

Special Land Acquisition Officer,

Old Custom House, 1st floor,

Fort, Mumbai

Sub: Acquisition of Plot No. 1087 and 1088 in TPS-IV of Mahim, Prabhadevi.

Sir,

Award for the above plot No. 1087 and 1088 declared on 1.6.1979 and 31.3.1982 respectively. Accordingly, this department paid compensation amount of Rs. 14,14,282/- on 26.7.79 and Rs. 13,29,897/- on 30.3.82 totaling to Rs. 27.65 lakhs including establishment charges. Inspite of voluminous correspondences and frequent visuals and meetings with you to get the vacant possession of the plots, the plot is not yet made over to MTNL. At present plot is fully encroached and you are not in a position to give vacant possession of the said plots.

It is once again requested to hand over the vacant possession within three months, failing which you are requested to refund the compensation paid by us with interest.

Sd/-

Dy. General Manager (Plg.)

MTNL, Mumbai”

(underlining is ours)

5. For the next about 8 years the officers of Bombay Telephones, Posts and Telegraph Department and the appellant are not shown to have sent any communication to the functionaries of the State Government including respondent No.2 in the matter of delivery of possession of the acquired land. They woke up from slumber in 2006. Between 1.1.2006 and 4.8.2006, about 20 communications were sent to respondent No.2 and others to deliver possession of Plot No.1088. In those communications, no mentio
















































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top