SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 66

Supreme Court of India
ALTMAS KABIR & CHELAMESWAR, JJ.
Republic of Italy & Others
Versus
Union of India & Others
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 135 of 2012 with Special Leave Petition (C) No. 20370 of 2012
Decided On : 18-01-2013

Advocate Appeared:
Ms. Gourab K. Banerji, ASG, Harish N. Salve, Suhail Dutt, V. Giri, Sr. Advocates, Diljeet Titus, Viplav Sharma, Baljit Singh Kalha, Ujjwal Sharma, Abhixit Singh, Achint Singh Gyani, Ankur Manchanda, Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Raghav Shankar, Jaswant Perraye, S.A. Haseeb, Ms. Parul Kumar, Ms. Jhuma Sen, Ms. Supriya Jain, D.S. Mahra, B. Krishna Prasad, Gautam Jha, Arjun Krishnan, Ramesh Babu M.R., Mohammed Sadique T.A., Sushrut Jindal, Ms. Rekha Pandey, Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Sahil Tagotra, R. Malhotra, Advocates.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14 and 21 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 and 34 - Maritime Zones Act, 1976 - Section 3 - Italian Penal Code - Section 575 – Enquiry – FIR - Past decade has witnessed sharp increase in acts of piracy on high seas off Coast of Somalia and even in vicinity Minicoy islands forming part of Lakshadweep archipelago - In an effort to counter piracy and ensure freedom of navigation of merchant shipping and for protection of vessels flying Italian flag in transit in International seas Republic of Italy enacted Government Decree converted into Law Parliament of Italy protect Italian ships from piracy in International seas - Article of said legislation provides for deployment of Italian Military Navy Contingents on Italian vessels flying Italian flag, to counter growing menace of piracy on seas – Held, Rate issue is not whether India can and in fact has asserted its sovereignty over areas beyond territorial waters - Issue in instant case is authority of Parliament extend laws beyond its territorial waters and jurisdiction of this Court to examine legality of such exercise - Even on facts case it can be noticed that operation of Customs Act was extended beyond territorial waters of India and this Court found it clearly permissible although on authority conferred by Maritime Zones - Implications of Article did not fall for consideration this Court in that Judgment - Coming to second issue whether incident in issue is an incident of navigation in order to exclude jurisdiction of India on ground that with respect to an incident of navigation penal proceedings could be instituted only before Judicial Authorities of Flag State or State of which the accused is national - Expression incident of navigation occurring Article is not defined expression - Necessarily meaning of expression must be ascertained from context and scheme of relevant provisions Article occurs in Part which deals with stipulates application – Order accordingly

Judgment :

Altmas Kabir, CJI.

1. The past decade has witnessed a sharp increase in acts of piracy on the high seas off the Coast of Somalia and even in the vicinity of the Minicoy islands forming part of the Lakshadweep archipelago. In an effort to counter piracy and to ensure freedom of navigation of merchant shipping and for the protection of vessels flying the Italian flag in transit in International seas, the Republic of Italy enacted Government Decree 107 of 2011, converted into Law of Parliament of Italy No.130 of 2nd August, 2011, to protect Italian ships from piracy in International seas. Article 5 of the said legislation provides for deployment of Italian Military Navy Contingents on Italian vessels flying the Italian flag, to counter the growing menace of piracy on the seas. Pursuant to the said law of Parliament of Italy No.130 of 2nd August, 2011, a Protocol of Agreement was purportedly entered into on 11th October, 2011, between the Ministry of Defence - Naval Staff and Italian Shipowners’ Confederation (Confitarma), pursuant to which the Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 in the writ Petition, who are also the Petitioner Nos.1 and 2 in the Special Leave Petition, were deployed along with four others, as “Team Latorre”, on board the “M.V. Enrica Lexie” on 6th February, 2012, to protect the said vessel and to embark thereon on 11th February, 2011, from Galle in Sri Lanka. The said Military Deployment Order was sent by the Italian Navy General Staff to the concerned Military Attaches in New Delhi, India and Muscat, Oman. A change in the disembarkation plans, whereby the planned port of disembarkation was shifted from Muscat to Djibouti, was also intimated to the concerned Attaches.

2. While the aforesaid vessel, with the Military Protection Detachment on board, was heading for Djibouti on 15th February, 2012, it came across an Indian fishing vessel, St. Antony, which it allegedly mistook to be a pirate vessel, at a distance of about 20.5 nautical miles from the Indian sea coast off the State of Kerala, and on account of firing from the Italian vessel, two persons in the Indian fishing vessel were killed. After the said incident, the Italian vessel continued on its scheduled course to Djibouti. When the vessel had proceeded about 38 nautical miles on the High Seas towards Djibouti, it received a telephone message, as well as an e-mail, from the Maritime Rescue Co-ordination Centre, Mumbai, asking it to return to Cochin Port to assist with the enquiry into the incident. Responding to the message, the M.V. Enrica Lexie altered its course and came to Cochin Port on 16th February, 2012. Upon docking in Cochin, the Master of the vessel was informed that First Information Report (F.I.R.) No.2 of 2012 had been lodged with the Circle Inspector, Neendakara, Kollam, Kerala, under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.) in respect of the firing incident leading to the death of the two Indian fishermen. On 19th February, 2012, Massimilano Latorre and Salvatore Girone, the Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 in Writ Petition No.135 of 2012, were arrested by the Circle Inspector of Police, Coastal Police Station, Neendakara, Kollam, from Willington Island and have been in judicial custody ever since.

3. On 20th February, 2012, the petitioner Nos.2 and 3 were produced before the Chief Judicial Magistrate (C.J.M.), Kollam, by the Circle Inspector of Police, Coastal Police Station, Neendakara, who prayed for remand of the accused to judicial custody.

4. The petitioners thereupon filed Writ Petition No.4542 of 2012 before the Kerala High Court, under Article 226 of the Constitution, challenging the jurisdiction of the State of Kerala and the Circle Inspector of Police, Kollam District, Kerala, to register the F.I.R. and to conduct investigation on the basis thereof or to arrest the petitioner Nos.2 and 3 and to produce them before the Magistrate. The Writ Petitioners prayed for quashing of F.I.R. No.2 of 2012 on the file of the Circ
















































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top