S.S.NIJJAR, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
USHA BHARTI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Surinder Singh Nijjar, J.:-
Leave granted.
2. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow Bench) in Review Petition No.103 of 2013 on 4th July, 2013 dismissing the review petition filed by the appellant.
3. Since the issues raised in these appeals are pristinely legal, it would not be necessary to make a detailed reference to the facts, leading to the filing of the present appeals. Even otherwise, the High Court in the impugned judgment has made an elaborate survey of the facts. Therefore, it is unnecessary to repeat the same. However, the foundational facts for challenging the impugned judgment of the High Court are recapitulated for ready reference.
4. The appellant successfully contested the election held in October, 2010 for becoming a Member of the Zila Panchayat, Sitapur, U.P. 62 candidates were elected as the Members of the Zila Panchayat including the appellant and respondents 5 to 37. On 12th December, 2010, the appellant was elected as Adhyaksh of the Zila Panchayat, Sitapur. On 30th October
Suseel Finance & Leasing Co. v. M. Lata
Bhanumati v. State of Uttar Pradesh through its Principal Secretary
Zaverbhai Amaidas v. State of Bombay
N. Bhargawan Pillai v. State of Kerala
State of U.P. v. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd.
Nirmaljeet Kaur v. State of M.P.
Zee Telefilms Ltd. v. Union of India
Board of Control for Cricket in India v. Netaji Cricket Club
S. Nagaraj v. State of Karnataka
Green View Tea & Industries v. Collector, Golaghat, Assam
Shanker Motiram Nale v. Shiolalsing Gannusing Rajput
Ch. Tika Ramji v. State of U.P.
Union of India v. G.Ganayutham
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.