SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 513

H. L. DATTU, A. K. SIKRI
Kamalakar Eknath Salunkhe – Appellant
Versus
Baburav Vishnu Javalkar – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No. 7459 of 2012, dated 19.12.2012. By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has dismissed the writ petition filed by the Plaintiff/appellant herein and upheld the order passed by the Trial Court in Special Civil Suit No. 129 of 2011, dated 13.03.2012, whereby the Trial Court had concluded that the plea of limitation can be decided as a preliminary issue Under Section 9A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, "the Code") and thereby, allowed the parties to lead evidence for determination of the same.

2. The parties in the appeal are referred as arrayed before the Trial Court. The Appellant is the Plaintiff and the Respondents are the Defendants.

3. The facts, in brief, are: the Defendants Nos. 1 to 3 agreed to sell the suit schedule property situated at Mouje Takli Taluka, Pandharpur, District Solapur by an agreement of sale in favour of the Plaintiff for the total consideration of Rs. 12,00,000/-. The Plaintiff in part-payment of the aforesaid agreed consideration had paid Rs. 10,00,000/- to the Defendants Nos. 1 to 3 and secur

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top