A.K.SIKRI, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
FIBRE BOARDS (P) LTD. BANGALORE – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE – Respondent
Judgment
R.F. Nariman, J.
1. The assessee, a private limited company, had an industrial unit at Majiwada, Thane, which was a notified urban area. With a view to shift its industrial undertaking from an urban area to a non-urban area at Kurukumbh Village, Pune District, Maharashtra, it sold its land, building and plant and machinery situated at Majiwada, Thane to Shree Vardhman Trust for a consideration of Rs.1,20,00,000/-, and after deducting an amount of Rs.11,62,956/-, had earned a capital gain of Rs.1,08,33,044/-. Since it intended to shift its industrial undertaking from an urban area to a non-urban area, out of the capital gain so earned, the appellant paid by way of advances various amounts to different persons for purchase of land, plant and machinery, construction of factory building etc. Such advances amounted to Rs.1,11,42,973/-in the year 1991-1992. The appellant claimed exemption under Section 54G of the Income Tax Act on the entire capital gain earned from the sale proceeds of its erstwhile industrial undertaking situate in Thane in view of the advances so made bei
State of Orissa v. M/s M.A. Tulloch and Co.
Ratan Lal Adukia v. Union of India
Poonjabhai Vanmalidas v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Ahmedabad
State of Punjab v. Harnek Singh
Rayala Corporation (P) Ltd. and M.R. Pratap v. Director of Enforcement, New Delhi
Kolhapur Canesugar Works Ltd. v. Union of India
General Finance Company v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Punjab
Mamleshwar Prasad v. Kanahaiya Lal (dead) through LRs.
State of U.P. v. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd.
State of Orissa v. M.A. Tulloch & Co.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.