SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 637

T. S. THAKUR, R. BANUMATHI, UDAY UMESH LALIT
B. Bal Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Teegala Narayana Reddy – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Uday Umesh Lalit, J.

1. Leave granted. These appeals challenge the judgment and order dated 06.08.2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Civil Revision Petition No.4904/2006 and in Civil Revision Petition Nos.447 of 2007 and 448 of 2007 which were disposed of on the same date in terms of the judgment and order in Civil Revision Petition No.4904 of 2006. Since the High Court had considered Civil Revision Petition No.4904 of 2006 as the lead matter, the appeal arising therefrom is also taken as the lead matter by us.

2. One Teegala Shivaiah was a Protected Tenant in respect of agricultural lands bearing Survey No.359(old) corresponding to Survey No.121(new) situated at Koheda Village (hereinafter referred to as the said land). Wasool Baqui as regards the said land for the year 1954 and certificate under Sections 35 and 37 of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) record the name of Teegala Shivaiah as Protected Tenant. The fact that said Teegala Shivaiah was a Protected Tenant is not disputed. The respondents are the heirs and successors of said Teegala Shivaiah who died sometime in t

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top