DIPAK MISRA, A. M. KHANWILKAR, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Raghuwar Pal Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.M. Khanwilkar, J.
1. The central questions posed in this appeal are:
(i) whether the appointment of the respondent to the post of Veterinary Compounder, made by the Director Incharge at the relevant point of time without approval of the Competent Authority, was a nullity or a mere irregularity, which could be glossed over by the department to avert disruption of his services and;
(ii) in any case, whether his services could be disrupted without giving him an opportunity of hearing.
2. Briefly stated, the respondent was appointed to the post of Veterinary Compounder in the Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying by one H.S. Rathore, the then Agriculture Officer, Central Cattle Breeding Farms (CCBF), Suratgarh, who was purportedly authorised only to look after the current duties of the post of Director. The appointment was made in November 1999 on a provisional and temporary basis, pursuant to the advertisement published in the newspaper on 15.10.1999. However, by an office order dated 29th August, 2000 issued under the signature of Dr. M.N. Haque, Director, the services of respondent came to be terminated. The said order reads thus:
“Government of India
Ministry of Agricul
Union of India v. M. Bhaskaran
State of U.P. v. U.P. State Law Officers Association
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan v. Ajay Kumar Das
D.K. Yadav v. J.M.A. Industries Ltd.
Bhupal Singh v. State of Rajasthan
State of Manipur v. Y. Token Singh
The Remington Rand of India Ltd. v. The Workmen
Karnal Improvement Trust, Karnal v. Parkash Wanti (Smt.) (Dead)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.