SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 318

Vijay Raikwar – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

M.R.SHAH, J.

Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 02.07.2014 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur passed in Criminal Appeal No.198 of 2014 by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal and confirmed the judgment and order dated 23.12.2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rehli, District Sagar, Madhya Pradesh in Sessions Trial No.49 of 2013 and has confirmed the conviction of the original accused for the offences punishable under Section 376 (2) (f) and Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) as well as Sections 5(i), 5(m) and 5(r) read with Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) and has confirmed the death penalty imposed, original accused has preferred the present appeal.

2. That the appellant/original accused was tried by the Trial Court for the offences punishable under Section 376 (2) (f) and Section 201 of the IPC as well as Sections 5(i), 5(m) and 5(r) read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act for having committed the murder of the minor girl aged 7 ½ years after raping her. On considering the incriminating material against the accused and on ap








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top