SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(SC) 1150

G.S.SINGHVI, V.GOPALA GOWDA, C.NAGAPPAN
UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION – Appellant
Versus
ARUN KUMAR SHARMA – Respondent


ORDER :

1. Leave granted. The questions which arise for consideration in this appeal filed against order dated 19.5.2011 passed by the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court in WPCT No. 831 of 2003 are whether Calcutta Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (for short, 'the Tribunal') had the jurisdiction to re-assess the relative merit of Respondent No. 1 and the private Respondents and whether the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court rightly refused to interfere with order dated 1.4.2003 passed by the Tribunal in O.A. No. 1064 of 1996 for re-convening the Selection Committee for promotion to the Indian Police Service.

2. Respondent No. 1 joined the State Police Service on 09.06.1979. His case was considered by the Selection Committees constituted for preparation of the Select List for promotion of the State Police Service officers to the Indian Police Service against the vacancies of 1995 and 1996. For the year 1995, the State Government had reported two vacancies in the promotion quota which were required to be filled in accordance with the provisions contained in the Indian Police Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955 (for short, 'the Regulation). As



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top