SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 1103

R.F.NARIMAN, SURYA KANT, V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
State of West Bengal – Appellant
Versus
Calcutta Club Limited – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Parties:Madhumita Bhattacharjee, Srija Choudhury, K.M. Natraj, ASG Dhruv Agarwal, Nisha Bagchi, Sunita Rani Singh, D.L. Chidananda, Pooja Sharma, Sharath Nambiar, B. Krishna Prasad, B. V. Balaram Das, Shyam Divan, S.K. Bagaria, Amit Thakkar, Mahesh Agarwal, Shamik Sajanwala, Abhinav Agrawal, Udayaditya Banarjee, Yojit Mehra, E. C. Agrawala, Neerav Mainkar, Dhwani Mainkar, Anil Kumar Gautam, Arvind P. Datar, Amar Dave, Ajitsinh Jadeja, Pradhuman Gohil, Taruna Singh Gohil, Vikash Singh, Ranu Purohit, Shiva P., Dhruraj Rana, Devang Nanavati, Pradhuman Gohil, Vikash Singh, Krishal H. Patel, Taruna Singh Gohil, Ranu Purohit, Shiva P., Jaideep Gupta, Rana Mukherjee, Partha Sil, Tavish B. Prasad, Lakshmi N. Kaimal, Rajesh Kumar, Sunita Rawat, Rahul Krishna, S.K. Kulkarni, M. Gireesh Kumar, Ankur S. Kulkarni, Nakul Dewan, Ejaz Maqbool, Akriti Chaubey, Kunwar Aditya Singh, Gautam Prabhakar, V. Raghuraman, Anand Sukumar, S. Sukumaran, Bhupesh Kumar Pathak, Mrs. Meera Mathur, Rajeev Singh, M/s. S. Narain & Co., Prateek Chadha, Pratap Venugopal, Surekha Raman, Viddusshi, Akhil Abraham Roy, For M/s. K J John And Co, Ajay Kumar, Vijay Goswami, Ranjith Kumar, Shivam Ojha, Charanya Lakshmikumaran, V. Lakshmikumaran, Karan Sachdev, Aaditya Bhattacharya, Apeksha Mehta, Ishita Mathur, Mounica Kasturi, Punit Dutt Tyagi, M. P. Devanath, P.K. Sahu, Prashant Shukla, Kedar Nath Tripathy, J.K. Mittal, Vandana Mittal, Praveen Swarup, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

R.F. Nariman, J.

C.A. No.4184 of 2009

1. This Appeal arises out of a reference order by a Division Bench of this Court, reported in State of West Bengal v. Calcutta Club Limited (2017) 5 SCC 356. The facts of Civil Appeal No.4184 of 2009 are set out in the said reference order as follows:

“2. The facts that are necessary to be stated are that the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes issued a notice to the respondent Club assessee apprising it that it had failed to make payment of sales tax on sale of food and drinks to the permanent members during the quarter ending 30-6-2002. After the receipt of the notice, the respondent Club submitted a representation and the assessing authority required the respondent Club to appear before it on 18-10-2002. The notice and the communication sent for personal hearing was assailed by the respondent before the Tribunal praying for a declaration that it is not a dealer within the meaning of the Act as there is no sale of any goods in the form of food, refreshments, drinks, etc. by the Club to its permanent members and hence, it is not liable to pay sales tax under the Act. A prayer was also made before the Tribunal for nullifying the a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top