S. A. BOBDE, B. R. GAVAI, SURYA KANT
Pranav Verma – Appellant
Versus
Registrar General of The High Court of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. These Writ Petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution have been filed at the instance of more than 90 candidates challenging the entire selection process and evaluation method adopted in the Main (Written) Examination of Civil Judge (Junior Division) [herein referred to as “Main Exam”] in the Haryana Civil Service (Judicial Branch) Examination – 2017 and seeking to quash the result declared on 11.4.2019 along with the directions to get all the papers of the Main Exam of the petitioners to be re-evaluated by an Independent Expert Committee, besides the constitution of an Independent Judicial Service Commission for conducting examinations for selection of Lower Judicial Officers.
Factual Background
2. Pursuant to the Notification-cum-Advertisement No. 6 of 2016 published on 20.03.2017 [herein after referred to as the “Original Notification”] for recruitment to 109 posts of Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Haryana Civil Service (Judicial Branch) – 2017, Preliminary Examination was conducted on 16.07.2017. However, on account of question paper-leak, the High Court of
Centre for Public Interest Litigation vs. Registrar-General High Court of Delhi
Sanjay Singh & Anr vs U.P. Public Service Commission
Sujasha Mukherji vs High Court of Calcutta
Taniya Malik vs. The Registrar General of Delhi High Court
Lila Dhar v. State of Rajasthan
H.P. Public Service Commission v. Mukesh Thakur
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.