SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 202

N.V.RAMANA, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, R.SUBHASH REDDY, B.R.GAVAI, SURYA KANT
SHAH FAESAL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Judgement Key Points

The paragraph that states that a high court exercises power over its own territory only is the one that discusses the scope of judicial authority and the importance of judicial decisions in maintaining legal certainty and stability. It emphasizes that decisions are binding within the context of the case and the particular facts, and that the principle of precedent is fundamental to ensuring consistency and confidence in the legal system. This paragraph underscores that each court's authority is limited to its jurisdiction and that decisions are applicable to the parties involved and the specific circumstances of the case, rather than extending beyond its territorial or jurisdictional boundaries (!) .


ORDER

1. These cases pertain to the constitutional challenge before this Court as regards to two Constitution Orders issued by the President of India in exercise of his powers under Article 370 of the Constitution of India.

2. At the outset, learned senior counsel appearing for one of the Petitioners in W.P. (C) No. 1013/19 and Petitioner in W.P. (C) 1368/19 raised the contention that the present matter needs to be referred to a larger Bench as there were contrary opinions by two different Constitution Benches on the interpretation of Article 370 of the Constitution. This order is confined to the limited preliminary issue of whether the matter should be referred to a larger Bench. We have not considered any issue on the merits of the dispute.

3. A brief introduction to the issue to set the context for this order is that after the late Maharaja of Kashmir had entered into a treaty of accession with the Indian State, Article 370 was incorporated into the Indian Constitution, which states as follows:

    370. Temporary provisions with respect to the State of Jammu and Kashmir

    (1) Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution,—

    (a) the provisions of article 238 shall not apply in relation to t


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top