SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 316

ARUN MISHRA, INDIRA BANERJEE, VINEET SARAN, M.R.SHAH, ANIRUDDHA BOSE
CHEBROLU LEELA PRASAD RAO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF A. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :C. S. N. Mohan Rao, R. Santhaan Krishnan, Lokesh Sharma, Aditya Kumar Archiya, Sangeeta Chandra, Praveen Kumar Pandey, Anand Padmanabhan, G. Ramakrishna Prasad, Suyodhan Byrapaneni, Filza Moonis, Bharat J. Joshi, Tatini Basu, Mohd. Wasay Khan, G. V. R. Choudary, K. Shivraj Choudhuri, Harsh Singhal, Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Advocates
For the Respondents:S. Udaya K. Sagar, Swati Bhardwaj, Mohith Rao, R. Venkataramani, G. N. Reddy, T. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, Digvijay Harichandan, C. K. Sucharita, Hemal Kiritkumar Sheth, Shivam Singh, Harpreet Singh Gupta, Udita Singh, Lakshmi Raman Singh, John Mathew, M/S. Venkat Palwai Law Associates, Advocates

JUDGMENT

ARUN MISHRA, J.

1. In the reference, the validity of the Government Office Ms. No.3 dated 10.1.2000 issued by the erstwhile State of Andhra Pradesh providing 100% reservation to the Scheduled Tribe candidates out of whom 33.1/3% shall be women for the post of teachers in the schools in the scheduled areas in the State of Andhra Pradesh, is under challenge.

2. Several questions have been referred for consideration in the order dated 11.1.2016. We have renumbered question nos.1(a)(b)(c) and (d) based on interconnection. The questions are as follows:

    “(1) What is the scope of paragraph 5(1), Schedule V to the Constitution of India?

    (a) Does the provision empower the Governor to make a new law?

    (b) Does the power extend to subordinate legislation?

    (c) Can the exercise of the power conferred therein override fundamental rights guaranteed under Part III?

    (d) Does the exercise of such power override any parallel exercise of power by the President under Article 371D?

    (2) Whether 100% reservation is permissible under the Constitution?

    (3) Whether the notification merely contemplates a classification under Article 16(1) and not reservation under Article 16(4)?

    (4) Whether the conditions of e


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top