A.M.KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI
Hukum Chand Deswal – Appellant
Versus
Satish Raj Deswal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
A.M. Khanwilkar, J.
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the original plaintiff (in CS(OS) No. 2041/2013 filed in High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) [For short, “the High Court”], under Article 129 of the Constitution of India read with Sections 12 and 14 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 [For short, “the 1971 Act”] and read with Rule 3 of the Rules to Regulate Proceedings for Contempt of the Supreme Court, 1975 [For short, “the 1975 Rules”] in reference to the order dated 22.2.2019 passed by this Court in SLP(C) Nos. 5147/2019 and 5350/2019, which reads thus:
“We are not inclined to interfere with the Special Leave Petition.
However, we accede to the request made by the petitioner to grant four weeks’ time to vacate the suit premises. That shall be subject to payment of all the outstanding dues/arrears and filing undertaking before this Court within two weeks’ from today.
It is made clear that if the premises are not vacated as per the undertaking, it will be viewed sternly.
The Special Leave Petition is disposed of accordingly. All IAs are also disposed of.”
2. The gravamen of the grievance of the petitioner/original plaintiff is that the respondent [defendant in CS
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.