SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 525

S. A. BOBDE, A. S. BOPANNA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
R. POORNIMA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Rakesh Dwivedi, Kaustubh Shukla, Subhasish Bhowmick, Eklavya Dwivedi, Abhay Singh, A.K. Mishra, Advocates
For the Respondent:R.S. Suri, ASG Applicant(s) Piyush Beriwal, Ms. Priyanka Das, Arvind Kumar Sharma, Atmaram NS Nadkarni, D. L. Chidananda, Salvador Santosh Rebello, Alok Kumar Pandey, Ashwin Kumar D.S., Guru Krishnakumar, Deepayan Mandal, Arindam Ghosh, M. Yogesh Kanna, K. V. Vijayakumar, Vinay Navare, Anish R. Shah, Sharan Thakur, Mahesh Thakur, Siddhartha Thakur, Ketan Paul P. V. Yogeswaran, S. Nagamuthu, M.P. Parthiban, Hardik Gautam, Parthiv K. Goswami, Ishan Bisht, Ms. Palak Mahajan, Ms. Diksha Rai, M. A. Chinnasamy, Ms. C. Rubavathi, P. Rajaram, V. Senthil Kumar, M. Ajmal Khan, T. Ramesh, A. Lakshminarayanan, Mrs. L. Maheswari, Sriram Parakkat, M.S. Vishnu Sankar, Ms. Athira G. Nair, Sarath Janardhanan, Deepak Singh, Ms. Divya Jyoti Singh, Sripathy K.R., Ms. Anupama Sripathy, For M/s Lawfic, Senthil Jagadeesan, Ms. Mrinal Kanwar, Ms. Sonakshi Malhan, Ms. Suriti Chowdhary, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

S.A. Bobde, CJI.

1. Persons who were appointed as District Judges (Entry Level) by way of direct recruitment vide a Government Order G.O. Ms. No. 170, Home Department dated 18.02.2011 in the Tamil Nadu State Judicial Service have come up with this Writ Petition seeking the following reliefs:

    “(a) Issue a Writ in the nature of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Orders, Directions, to call for records relating to the last list of names recommended by the Hon’ble Chief Justice of High Court of Madras to the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India for appointment as Judges of Madras High Court and quash the same in so far as it relates to the names of Respondents No. 5 to 23 herein and consequently direct the Hon’ble Collegiums of the Madras High Court to consider the names of the Petitioners also for appointment as High Court Judges;

    OR

    (b) Issue a Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Orders, Directions, directing the Respondents No. 1 to 4 to return the last list of names for appointment as Judges of High Court, Madras recommended by the Hon’ble Chief Justice of High Court of Madras to the Hon’ble Chief J


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top