SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 34

S. A. BOBDE, A. S. BOPANNA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
ANKITA MEENA – Appellant
Versus
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner(s):Ashish Virmani, Advocate
For the Respondent(s):Mohinder Jit Singh, Advocate

ORDER :

V. Ramasubramanian, J.

1. Challenging an order of the learned single judge, confirmed by the division bench in an intra-court appeal, refusing to interfere with the decision of the University denying permission to her to appear in the 4th Semester LLB Examination, a student has come up with the above SLP.

2. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the University.

3. The petitioner joined the 3-year LLB Course at Law Centre-II, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi in August, 2016. By the time she joined the course she was already married for about 5 months.

4. The petitioner completed the first 3 semesters without any hindrance. However, she fell short of the required attendance during the 4th Semester, due to two difficulties. One was that she gave birth to a baby on 22.02.2018, disabling her to attend the classes till the end of March, 2018. The second difficulty was that the Delhi University Teachers’ Association went on a strike from 16.03.2018 and hence the University could not conduct the minimum number of classes as prescribed by Rul


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top