INDU MALHOTRA, AJAY RASTOGI
DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
NAVIGANT TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
INDU MALHOTRA, J.
Leave granted.
1. The present Civil Appeal arises from a Petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the Appellant-Bijli Vitrain Nigam to challenge the arbitral award dated 27.04.2018 passed by a three-member tribunal (2:1) in favour of the respondent company.
2. The issue which has arisen for our consideration is as to whether the period of limitation for filing the Petition under Section 34 would commence from the date on which the draft award dated 27.04.2018 was circulated to the parties, or the date on which the signed copy of the award was provided.
(i) The background facts emanate from a Service Level Agreement dated 02.05.2011 executed by the appellant-corporation in favour of the Respondent-company providing call centre services.
Clause 13 of the Agreement provided for resolution of disputes through arbitration by a three-member tribunal, under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Clause 13 reads as :
All matter question, disputes, differences and/or claims arising out of and/or concerning and/or in connection and/or in consequences or relating to the Contract whether or not obligations of eit
Ssangyong Engineering and Construction Co. ltd. v. NHAI.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. V. Acome and Ors.
Union of India v. Tecco Trichy Engineers & Contractors
State of Maharashtra v. Ark Builders
Anilkumar Jinabhai Patel v. Pravinchandra Jinabhai Patel (2018) 15 SCC 178 – Relied [Para 4]
State of Himachal Pradesh v Himachal Techno Engineers
Union of India v. Popular Construction
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.