Acquainted Realtors LLP etc. etc. vs State of Haryana

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(SC) 190

UDAY UMESH LALIT, VINEET SARAN
Acquainted Realtors LLP etc. etc. – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Yadav Narender Singh, AOR Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma, AOR Mr. Gagan Gupta, AOR Mr. Pratap Shanker, Adv. Mr. Ankit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Swetank Shantanu, AOR Mrs. Lalita Kaushik, AOR Mr. Siddharth Mittal, AOR Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Adv. Ms. Shilpa G. Mittal, Adv. Mr. Alok Sangwan, Sr. AAG. Mr. Sumit Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Anurag Kulharia, Adv. Mr. Sandeep, Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR Mr. Ram Naresh Yadav, AOR Ms. Usha Nandini. V, AOR Mr. Ram Naresh Yadav, AOR Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Ms. Mansi Gupta, Adv. Ms. Nandani Gupta, Adv. Mr. Krishna Kumar, Adv. Ms. Mamta Sharma, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, AOR Ms. Usha Nandini. V, AOR

JUDGMENT :

UDAY UMESH LALIT, J.

1. Delay condoned. Leave granted in all matters.

2. These appeals challenge the judgment and order date 01.06.2018 passed by the High Court ¹[The High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh] in RFA No.384 of 2013 (O&M) [Tej Singh and another v. State of Haryana and others], based on which the individual appeals were disposed of.

3. The facts leading to the instant appeals, in brief, are as under:-

(A) The proceedings for acquisition of lands were initiated vide Notification dated 27.09.2005 issued under Section 4 of the Act²[The Land Acquisition Act, 1894] for the purpose of setting up Industrial Model Township, Phase-VI, Manesar, Gurgaon for the development of an integrated complex for industrial, commercial, recreational and other public utilities.

(B) The aforesaid Notification was followed by Declaration dated 02.06.2006 issued under Section 6 of the Act. The lands sought to be acquired, admeasured 465 acres 5 Kanals 7 Marlas, the details of which as tabulated by the High Court were:-

“Scheme	Villages	Area
“Scheme	Villages	Kanal	Marla
Transport

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(SC) 190

UDAY UMESH LALIT, VINEET SARANAcquainted Realtors LLP etc. etc. – AppellantVersusState of Haryana – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

UDAY UMESH LALIT, VINEET SARAN
Acquainted Realtors LLP etc. etc. – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent