Back
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, DINESH MAHESHWARI, HRISHIKESH ROY
In Re : Advocate On Record Includes A Proprietary Firm Etc. – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.
1. The repeated emails of the petitioner, and not very palatable at that, resulted in an administrative decision to take up the issue on the judicial side. The question which we have formulated by our order dated 12.10.2020 is, whether an Advocate on Record can have entry in Advocate On Record register in the form of his style of carrying on profession i.e. instead of “Siddharth Murarka” as “Law Chambers of Siddharth Murarka”?. The plea of the petitioner is based on doing similar filing in different High Courts but not being permitted to do so in Supreme Court which, he claims, puts him at a disadvantage against partnership firms since there is no impediment in the constitution of a partnership firm of Advocates where two or more Advocates on Record may constitute a firm.
2. In the course of proceedings today, at the inception itself, we heard Mr. Siddharth Murarka to understand what his grievance was. We also put to him clearly that the manner he has addressed the emails and the language used whether against the officers of this Court or against other advocates is not acceptable. Mr. Siddharth Murarka submits that he unconditionally withdraws all ema
Right of appearance of Advocates – Right of an Advocate to appear for a party and to practise in courts is coupled with duty to remain present in court at the time of hearing, and to participate and ....
The authority of the Supreme Court to make rules under Article 145 of the Constitution, and the saving clause under Section 52 of The Advocates Act, 1961, provide the legal framework for the regulati....
Prohibition on the use of the High Court's name and specific nomenclature under the Emblems and Names Act, 1950 and the Advocate Act, 1961.
The impugned rule restricting enrolment of advocates engaging in other professions is a reasonable restriction under the Advocates Act and Articles 19(1)(g), 14, and 21 of the Constitution, ensuring ....
The court established that advocates cannot use military or academic titles as prefixes or suffixes in legal practice, ensuring equality and integrity in the profession.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
