SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HRISHIKESH ROY
Laxmibai Chandaragi B. – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.
Rule.
1. We have heard learned counsel for parties.
2. One Mr. Basappa Chandaragi lodged a complaint with the Murgod Police Station, Savadatti Taluk, Belagavi District stating that his daughter Ms. Laxmibai Chandaragi, petitioner No. 1 herein was missing since 14.10.2020. In pursuance to the complaint, FIR No. 226/2020 of a missing person was registered and the investigation officer recorded the statement of the missing person’s parents and her relatives and took call details. From the call details, it became apparent that the petitioner No. 1 was in contact with Mr. Santosh Singh Yadav, petitioner No. 2. In the course of investigation it was found that the petitioner No. 1, apparently without informing her parents, had travelled by flight from Hubli to Bangalore and further from Bangalore to Delhi and thereafter married petitioner No. 2. The petitioner No. 1 sent her marriage certificate to her parents through whatsapp on 15.10.2020 in which she revealed the factum of marriage to petitioner No. 2. It is the case of the State that the IO proceeded to Ghaziabad to know the whereabouts of petitioner No. 1 and on visiting the residence of petitioner No. 2
Shakti Vahini vs. Union of India
Asha Ranjan vs. State of Bihar
Shafin Jahan vs. Asokan K.M. and Others
Lata Singh vs. State of U.P. (2006) 5 SCC 475 – Referred (Para 11)
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy vs. Union of India
Asha Ranjan vs. State of Bihar
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy vs. Union of India
Lata Singh vs. State of U.P. (2006) 5 SCC 475
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.