Naser Bin Abu Bakr Yafai vs State of Maharashtra

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(SC) 632

Naser Bin Abu Bakr Yafai – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s):Farrukh Rasheed, Abu Bakr Sabbaq, Zahid Hussain, Satya Mitra, Advocates
For the Respondent(s):K.M. Nataraj, S.V. Raju, Kanu Agrawal, Sairica Raju, Swati Ghildiyal, Zoheb Hussain, B. V. Balaram Das, Rahul Chitnis, Sachin Patil, Aaditya A. Pande, Geo Joseph, Advocates

Table of Content
1. overview of the factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details on the investigation and charge-sheet filed by the ats. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. legal challenges posed by the appellants regarding jurisdiction. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. arguments regarding jurisdiction under nia act and actions of ats. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. examination of nia act provisions relevant to case jurisdiction. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
6. implications of investigation jurisdiction under nia act. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
7. judicial standards for evaluating investigation commencement. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
8. clarification of court jurisdiction on trial post-investigation. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43)
9. limitations regarding charge-sheet filing and jurisdiction. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48)
10. final observations on jurisdiction and case authority. (Para 49)
11. conclusions affirming the high court's ruling and dismissing appeals. (Para 50 , 51 , 52)

DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.

(A)	Facts
(B)	Submissions
(C)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(SC) 632

Naser Bin Abu Bakr Yafai – AppellantVersusState of Maharashtra – Respondent

Naser Bin Abu Bakr Yafai – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent