UDAY UMESH LALIT, S. RAVINDRA BHAT
MUSUNURI SATYANARAYANA – Appellant
Versus
TIRUMALA INDIRA DEVI – Respondent
ORDER :
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.
1. Special leave granted. With consent of counsel for the parties, the appeals were heard finally. The appellant is aggrieved by an order of the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Andhra and Telangana1[Dated 12.06.2015 in CRP No. 816/2015 and CRP No. 3591/2015] dismissing his revision petitions.
2. The appellant (hereafter called “Musunuri Satyanarayana”) had approached Andhra Pradesh Tenancy Tribunal (hereafter “the tribunal”) claiming various reliefs under Section 16 (1) of the Andhra Pradesh Tenancy (Andhra Area) Act (hereafter “the Tenancy Act”) i.e. for declaratory relief that the price of the schedule land i.e., Rs. 1,25,000/per acre is reasonable and stood accepted by the first respondent (hereafter “Indira Devi”) by receiving the first instalment of Rs. 49,125/- by demand draft; that he was entitled to pay the balance sale price of Rs. 4,42,125/- to Indira Devi in nine instalments; for a declaration that two registered sale deed documents2[Nos. 139/06 dated 03-02-06 and the registered sale deed document No. 140/06, dated 03-02-06] (hereafter “the impugned sale deeds”) executed by Indira Devi in favour of the second and third res
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.