IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
Basappa Revanappa Kavali, Since Deceased By His Lr’s., Anand S/o. Basappa Kavali – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka, R/By Its Secretary, Revenue Deparment – Respondent
ORDER :
ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE, J.
1. The petitioners have assailed the order passed by the Land Tribunal, marked at Annexure-G.
2. In terms of the impugned order dated 18.03.2003, the Land Tribunal has conferred occupancy rights in favour of contesting respondents.
3. There were two different Form No.7 applications filed seeking occupancy rights in respect of two different survey numbers, in respect of different extents mentioned in Form No.7.
4. Rama Govind Marathe was one applicant. Pundalik Govind Marathe was another. By the time the matter was heard by the Land Tribunal in the year 2002, pursuant to the remand order passed by this Court, original applicants were no more and the legal representatives of the original applicants participated in the proceedings.
5. The petitioner/landlord (the legal representative of original landlady Gangawwa) is before this Court assailing the said order granting occupancy.
6. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners taking through the facts of the case would contend that the properties in question were originally tenanted lands. Hari Govind Marathe was the tenant. In terms of resumption order dated 04.03.1957, marked at Annexure-A, tenancy in respe


Mohan Balaku Patil and others vs. Krishnoji Bhaurao Hundre
Raghunath Prasad Pandey vs. State of Karnataka
Ramachandra Keshav Adke (Dead) By LRs. And Others Vs. Govind Joti Chavare and Others
Abdul Ajij Shaik Jumma and Another vs. Dasharath Indas Nhavi and others
Continuance of unrecorded tenancy established due to failure of original tenants to validate their surrender of tenancy, reinforcing tenancy rights under the applicable laws.
The court emphasized that tenants must establish lawful possession to claim occupancy rights, and any purported surrender of tenancy must follow statutory procedures under the Karnataka Land Reforms ....
Point of Law : Land Tribunal is bound by the statutory presumption as to entries made in record of rights and order of the Tribunal without any reference to such entries and having no discussion as ....
The court affirmed that the protected tenant's rights under the Tenancy Act cannot be overridden by private agreements or settlements that do not comply with statutory requirements.
A landlord cannot obtain possession of surrendered land without an order from the Tahsildar, despite a verified surrender; tenant's rights are upheld until such an order is made.
If on the relevant date appellants were in cultivation and possession of the land, they are entitled to registration of the occupancy rights in respect of the land.
Proper evaluation of documentary evidence is vital in determining occupancy rights; reliance solely on revenue records without considering the broader context can lead to errors in legal judgments.
Tenancy rights cannot be terminated without due process under the Tenancy Act, and any mutation affecting such rights must follow proper notice procedures.
(1) Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 is a beneficent legislation for granting occupancy rights to cultivating tenants of agricultural lands.(2) Order of remand cannot be passed as a matter of course ....
The validity of a registered lease deed executed by a relative supersedes an unaccepted Gift Deed when ownership is in question.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.