S. A. BOBDE, R. BANUMATHI, ASHOK BHUSHAN, L. NAGESWARA RAO, MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, S. ABDUL NAZEER, R. SUBHASH REDDY, B. R. GAVAI, SURYA KANT
Kantaru Rajeevaru – Appellant
Versus
Indian Young Lawyers Association – Respondent
ORDER :
S.A.BOBDE, CJI.
1. Indian Young Lawyers Association filed Writ Petition (Civil) No. 373 of 2006 challenging the validity of Rule 3(b) of the Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry) Rules, 1965 (for short, “the 1965 Rules”). A further direction to the respondents therein to permit female devotees between the ages of 10 to 50 years to enter the Sabarimala temple without any restrictions was sought in the Writ Petition. By an order dated 30th October 2017, a three Judge bench of this Court referred the matter to a larger bench for resolution of the questions raised in the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition was placed before a Constitution Bench consisting of five Judges. By a majority of 4:1, this Court allowed the Writ Petition on 28.09.2018. It was held by this Court that the devotees of Lord Ayyappa do not constitute a separate religious denomination and therefore cannot claim the benefit of Article 26 of the Constitution of India. This Court also concluded that exclusion of women between the ages of 10 to 50 years from entry into the temple is violative of Article 25 of the Constitution of India. Further, Rule 3 (b) of the Kerala Hindu Places of Public W
T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka
Durgah Committee, Ajmer vs. Syed Hussain Ali & Ors.
Dr. M.K. Salpekar v. Sunil Kumar Shamsunder Chaudhari & Ors.
Mohd. Shabir v. State of Maharashtra
Behram Pesikaka v. State of Bombay
Babu Lal vs. Hazari Lal Kishori Lal 1982 1 SCC 525
Naresh Mirajkar v. State of Maharashtra
Delhi Judicial Service Association v. State of Gujarat (1991) 4 SCC 406
Monica Kumar (Dr.) v. State of U.P. 2008 8 SCC 781
S. Nagaraj v. State of Karnataka
Central Bank of India v. Workmen
In Indra Sawhney vs. Union of India
T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka
M. P. Sharma and Others v. Satish Chandra
Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
Durgah Committee, Ajmer vs. Syed Hussain Ali & Ors.
Dr. M.K. Salpekar v. Sunil Kumar Shamsunder Chaudhari & Ors.
Mohd. Shabir v. State of Maharashtra
Behram Pesikaka v. State of Bombay
Babu Lal vs. Hazari Lal Kishori Lal 1982 1 SCC 525
Naresh Mirajkar v. State of Maharashtra
Delhi Judicial Service Association v. State of Gujarat (1991) 4 SCC 406
Monica Kumar (Dr.) v. State of U.P. 2008 8 SCC 781
S. Nagaraj v. State of Karnataka
Central Bank of India v. Workmen
In Indra Sawhney vs. Union of India
M. P. Sharma and Others v. Satish Chandra
Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.