SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, M. M. SUNDRESH
Competition Commission of India – Appellant
Versus
State of Mizoram – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.
Facts:
1. A complaint received by the Competition Commission of India (for short ‘appellant/CCI’) from respondent No. 4 seeking investigation under the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Competition Act’) in respect of State Lottery run by the State of Mizoram (respondent No. 1) has given rise to the present dispute. The jurisdiction of CCI to inquire into allegations of bid rigging, collusive bidding, and cartelisation in the tender process for appointment of selling agents and distributors for lotteries organised in the State of Mizoram has been challenged in the present proceedings by the successful bidders and to a much lesser extent, by the State of Mizoram.
2. The State of Mizoram issued an Invitation for Expression of Interest (for short ‘EoI’) through respondent No. 2, the Director, Institutional Finance and State Lottery (IF&SL) on 20.12.2011 inviting bids for the appointment of lottery distributors and selling agents for state lotteries to be organised by the Government of Mizoram in terms of the Mizoram Lotteries (R
B.R. Enterprises vs. State of U.P.
Sunrise Associates vs. Government of NCT of Delhi
Union of India vs. Martin Lotter Agencies Ltd.
Black Diamond Beverages vs. Commercial Tax Officer
State of Punjab vs. Devans Modern Breweries
Competition Commission of India vs. Steel Authority of India and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.