BIREN VAISHNAV
J. K. Paper Ltd. Through Santosh Wakhloo, Authorized Signatory Herein – Appellant
Versus
Competition Commissioner Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Rule. Ms. Garima Malhotra, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 2.
2. The present petition, in all, challenges four orders passed by the Competition Commission of India (for short, hereinafter referred to as `CCI’). The impugned orders are as under:
(2) Investigation Report dated 7.2.2019 prepared by the Office of the Director General, CCI in case No.30 of 2014 and case No.85 of 2015.
(3) Order dated 4.7.2019 rejecting the request of the petitioner to cross examine the informant of case No.30 of 2014 and informant in case No.85 of 2015.
(4) Orders dated 1.8.2014 and 17.11.2015 by the CCI under Section 26(1) of the Act by which the CCI has directed the Director General to file a joint investiga
Barium Chemicals Limited v. Company Law Board reported in AIR 1967 SC 295(1)
Commission of India v. Steel Authority of India Limited reported in 2010(10) SCC 744
Excel Crop Care Limited v. Competition Commission of India reported in 2017(8) SCC 47
G.B. Mahajan and others Vs. Jalgaon Municipal Council and others
Krishna Swami vs. Union of India [(1992) 4 SCC 605]
Rohtas Industries Limited v. S. D. Agarwal and another reported in AIR 1969 SC 707
State of Haryana and others v. Bhajan Lal and others
Sharma Prashant Raje v. Ganpatrao and others reported in 2000(7) SCC 522
Special Director vs. Mohd. Ghulam Ghouse (AIR 2004 SC 1467)
Samir Agrawal v. Competition Commission of India reported in 2021(3) SCC 136
State of U.P. vs. Brahm Datt Sharma (AIR 1987 SC 943)
T.C. Basappa Vs. T. Nagappa and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.