Walchandnagar Industries Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 130

HEMANT GUPTA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Walchandnagar Industries Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Jatin Zaveri, AOR Mr. Neel Kamal Mishra, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mishra, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR Mr. Rahul Chitnis, Adv. Mr. Aaditya A. Pande, Adv. Mr. Geo Joseph, Adv. Ms. Shwetal Shepal, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR Mr. Uday B. Dube, AOR

Table of Content
1. challenge to high court's judgment on compensation (Para 1 , 2)
2. background of land acquisition and transportation issues (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. claim for compensation for severance and injurious affection (Para 8 , 12 , 14 , 15)
4. court's evaluations of rolling stocks and claims (Para 18 , 19 , 21 , 22)
5. legal principles on compensation under land acquisition act (Para 29 , 30 , 32)
6. increase in transportation costs and operational changes (Para 50 , 52 , 63 , 66)
7. assessment of appellant's profit claims related to transport (Para 72 , 74 , 75)
8. final rulings on compensation claims (Para 77 , 79)

V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.

2. We have heard Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, learned senior advocate appearing for the appellant; Mr. Sachin Patil, learned advocate appearing for the first respondent-State and Mr. Deepak Nargolkar, learned senior advocate appearing for the second respondent-beneficiary.

4. For the purpose of transporting sugarcane and other goods, the appellant had laid trolley lines covering a distance of 50 kms. inside its estate. The appellant has also

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(SC) 130

HEMANT GUPTA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIANWalchandnagar Industries Ltd. – AppellantVersusState of Maharashtra – Respondent

HEMANT GUPTA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Walchandnagar Industries Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent