SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 136

AJAY RASTOGI, ABHAY S. OKA
Kamgar Swa Sadan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Vijaykumar Vitthalrao Sarvade – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nilesh R. Modi, Adv. Mr. Soumik Ghosal, AOR Mr. Bhairavnath Jhadav Adv Mr. Gaurav Singh Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta, AOR Mr. Amit V.Thakur, Adv. Mr. Shamik Shirishbhai Sanjanwala, AOR Mr. Shashibhushan P. Adgaonkar, Adv. Mr. Rahul Chitnis, Adv. Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR Mr. Aaditya A. Pande, Adv. Mr. Geo Joseph, Adv. Ms. Shwetal Shepal, Adv. Mr. Arun R. Pedneker, Adv. Mr. Harihar Bhave, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. M/S. Bhave And Associates, AOR Mr. Bhargava V. Desai, AOR Mr. Utkarsh Vats, Adv Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, AOR Amandeep Mehta, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

ABHAY S. OKA, J.

Leave granted.

1. The respondent nos.1 to 11 are the original plaintiffs. The appellant-Society is the original defendant no.1. The respondent nos.12 to 25 are the office bearers of the appellant-Society. The respondent nos. 26 to 29 are the developers/builders. The respondent nos. 30 to 38 are officials and/or the members of the High Power Committee constituted by the Government of Maharashtra. The last respondent is the Project Consultant and Architect. It is not in dispute that the respondent nos.1 to 11 (original plaintiffs) are the members of the appellant, a Co-operative Society duly registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (for short “the said Act of 1960). The dispute is about the redevelopment of the buildings occupied by the members of the appellant-Society in accordance with Regulation 33(7) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai, 1991 applicable to the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. In the Special General Body Meeting of the appellant-Society held on 12th February 2011, a resolution was passed resolving that the tender submitted by the respondent no.26 for the redevelopment of the property of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top