Back
VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
Shilpalaya Co-Operative Housing Society Limited – Appellant
Versus
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks writ of mandamus for redevelopment. (Para 1) |
| 2. factual background on society's formation and redevelopment processes. (Para 2) |
| 3. discussion by respondents regarding noc and representation. (Para 3) |
| 4. court hears petitioner’s arguments about majority consent. (Para 4) |
| 5. respondents raise concerns about proper process and legality. (Para 5) |
| 6. court reviews responses and stakeholder opinions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 7. petitioner's compliance with redevelopment regulations. (Para 10) |
| 8. legal provisions governing the redevelopment under consent requirements. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 9. court finds majority consent sufficient for proceeding with redevelopment. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 10. court orders vacating of premises for redevelopment. (Para 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT :
1. By way of present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner herein has prayed for the following reliefs :
B. YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writs, direction or order to the Respondent No. 1-Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation to execute
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
