IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Mauna M. Bhatt, J.
Gopinath Apartment Co Operative Housing Society Limited & Anr. – Petitioners
Versus
State Of Gujarat & Ors. - Respondents
R/Special Civil Application No. 25230 of 2022 With Civil Application (For Direction) No. 1 of 2024 In R/Special Civil Application No. 25230 of 2022 With Civil Application (For Direction) No. 2 of 2024 In R/Special Civil Application No. 25230 of 2022
Decided On : 19-11-2024
(A) Gujarat Provincial Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 264 and 268 - Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973 - Section 41A - Petition for redevelopment of dilapidated co-operative housing society - Majority consent of members for redevelopment established - Court directed to ensure peaceful possession for redevelopment. (Paras 55-56)
(B) Writ Jurisdiction - Maintainability - Writ petitions for mandamus against private respondents upheld as valid under Article 226 - Majority decisions of society binding on all members. (Paras 7.12-7.13)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner society, owning a dilapidated structure, sought redevelopment under Section 41A with majority consent from its members. Expert reports confirmed the unsafe condition of the building necessitating redevelopment. (Paras 1-2)
Findings of Court:
The petition was allowed based on established compliance with statutory requirements for redevelopment, directing objecting members to vacate. (Paras 55-56)
Issues: The court addressed compliance with Section 41A and the validity of majority consent for redevelopment against objections from minority members. (Paras 7.11-7.12)
Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed that majority decisions in co-operative societies are binding and that redevelopment can proceed when statutory conditions are met. (Paras 55-56)
Result: Petition allowed; minority members directed to vacate for redevelopment.
JUDGMENT :
Mauna M. Bhatt, J.
ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION No.2 of 2024
This application is filed by the Petitioner seeking amendment in the prayer clause and also to bring on record certain additional documents.
It is case of the applicant that in view of subsequent development during pendency of this petition, the amendment sought for is necessary. Further, the amendment prayed does not change the nature of pending proceedings.
Considering the submissions and averments made in the application, the amendment sought for is allowed as it does not change the nature of the petition. The applicant is directed to carry out the amendment forthwith.
Civil Application is allowed and disposed of accordingly.
ORDER IN SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION
1. This petition is filed seeking to direct respondent No.2 (Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation) to take action under Sections 264 and 268 of the Gujarat Provincial Municipal Corporation Act (GPMC Act). It is the case of petitioner-society that it owns the land and structure thereon situated at Final Plot No.125 admeasuring 3271 sq.mtrs of land (Old Survey No.76+92), Non Agricultural land of Town Planning Scheme No.26, Mouje Vasna, Taluka Sabarmati, Ahmedabad -4 (Paldi), District Ahmedabad, and that, the construction is in a dilapidated condition which requires to be redeveloped and for that, peaceful and vacant possession from all members is required. Directions against respondent Nos.1 and 2 are also sought to aid and ensure to hand over peaceful and vacant possession of the subject premises from respondent Nos.4 to 15 for redevelopment as per Section 41A of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973.
Brief Facts:
2. The petitioner No.1 herein is a Co-operative Society (herein after referred as ‘the Society’) registered under the provisions of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 having registration No.4945 with the certificate dated 12.07.1973. The said society is represented through its Chairman and Secretary in the present petition. The society is owner of the land bearing Final Plot No.124 admeasuring 3271 Sq.mtrs. (Old Survey no.76 + 92), Non-agricultural land of TP Scheme No.26, Mouje Vasna, Taluka: Sabarmati, District: Ahmedabad. The society consists of total 54 flats which are 40 years old, which are in a dilapidated condition. To ascertain the condition of the flats in question, the society had availed expert’s opinion in the form of structural stability certificate wherein, the building is stated to be unsafe to human life and requires demolition and rebuilding. Structural Stability Certificate dated 17.11.2020 along with photographs is forming part of record at Annexure-B (page 31 to 34).
2.1. In view of dilapidated condition of the society, Resolution No. 2018/01, dated 12.05.2018 (Annexure C page 35) was passed by which a decision with consent of all members was taken to redevelop the Society and accordingly under very Resolution dated 12.05.2018, a committee comprising of 15 members was constituted to act for re-development of society. The members present in the meeting have signed the resolution. Thereafter, one more resolution No. 2019/01 dated 21.03. 2019 was passed wherein 15 members re-development committee was reduced to 9 members. Accordingly, Society’s general meeting was decided to be held on 08.10.2019 (Annexure-D2 page 40), to discuss and decide the issues (including the offers received by various developers) in relation to re-development. Minutes of the meeting dated 08.10.2019 were drawn and signed by members present. Thereafter, in AGM dated 10.03.2020 (Annexure-D4 page 50) a decision was taken by more than 75% of members to give work of redevelopment to respondent No.3. Circular letter dated 11.11.2020 (Annexure-D4 page 57) was issued. Vide circular letter dated11.11.2020 all members were informed to remain present in the meeting to be held with developer (respondent No.-3). It is case of the Society that detailed discussion was held, various issues were discussed, queries of th
United Bank of India vs. Naresh Kumar and Ors. (1996) 6 SCC 660
M/s. Shatistar Builders V/s. Narayan Khimanlal Totame and Ors.
P Nazeer v/s. Salafi Trust AIR 2022 SC 1580
State Bank of Travancore v/s. Kingston Computers 2011 (11) SCC 524
Majority consent in cooperative societies is binding for redevelopment under Section 41A of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, enabling courts to enforce compliance despite minority objections.
The court upheld the validity of the redevelopment process under Section 41A of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973, and directed the respondents to vacate their flats and hand over peaceful and va....
The court upheld the validity of the redevelopment project under Section 41A of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973, based on the majority consent of the members, dilapidated condition of the build....
A cooperative society can proceed with redevelopment if 75% of members consent, prioritizing safety and majority decisions over individual objections.
A co-operative society's decision for redevelopment, supported by majority consent, is binding on all members, and individual objections cannot impede the process if statutory conditions are satisfie....
1. Substantial compliance with statutory provisions for redevelopment of a building is sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the law.
2. A writ court has the jurisdiction to issue a writ of ma....
Members of a cooperative society must adhere to the society's decisions and bylaws, losing individual rights in favor of collective governance.
The public interest in the redevelopment scheme and the lack of infringement of the petitioners' fundamental or legal rights were the main legal points established in the judgment.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the Court's exercise of plenary jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India to give quietus to the pending disputes and provide dir....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.