State of Uttarakhand vs Mayan Pal Singh Verma

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 329

M. R. SHAH, B. V. NAGARATHNA
State of Uttarakhand – Appellant
Versus
Mayan Pal Singh Verma – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Kaushal Pati Gautam, AAG Ms. Namita Choudhary, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Shree Pal Singh, AOR

JUDGMENT :

M.R. Shah, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in WPSB No. 9/2022, by which the High Court has disposed of the said writ petition without deciding the writ petition on merits and has directed the Department to comply with the order passed by the Tribunal which was under challenge before it, the State has preferred the present appeal.

2. Feeling aggrieved with the order passed by the Uttarakhand Public Service Tribunal, Dehradun (for short “Tribunal”) in Claim Petition No.104/DB/2009, by which the Tribunal directed the Department to ignore the uncommunicated “Uttam” entries in the ACRs while considering the case of the original applicant – private respondent herein for his promotion to the post of the Chief Engineer Level-2 by the reviewed ACP, the State of Uttarakhand had preferred the writ petition before the High Court. By the impugned order, the Division Bench of the High Court has disposed of the said writ petition without deciding the writ petition on merits and without expressing anything on the legality and validity of the order passed by the Tribunal and has direct

Click Here to Read the rest of this document