HEMANT GUPTA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Darshna Kumari @ Darshan Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Sohan Singh – Respondent
ORDER :
The Civil Appeal Nos.1077-1078/2012 preferred by the plaintiffs are directed against the judgment and decree passed by the High Court dated 19.12.2007 whereby the High Court dismissed the suit of the plaintiffs – appellants seeking declaration of ownership on the ground that the mortgage has not been redeemed within a period of 20 years in terms of the decree confirmed by the Lahore High Court vide judgment dated 26.02.1947.
2. The Civil Appeal Nos.1045-1046/2012 are preferred by the State claiming that the mortgagors were the Muslims who migrated to Pakistan and, therefore, by virtue of the provisions of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 19501[For short, the ‘1950 Act’], the land came to be vested with the Government. Therefore, the State would be the mortgagors and is thus entitled to seek redemption in terms of the Judgment of this Court reported as ‘Singh Ram (Dead) Through Legal Representatives Vs. Sheo Ram & Ors.’, (2014) 9 SCC 185.
3. The brief facts leading to the present appeals are that one Puran Ditta and Sondhi executed three mortgage deeds mortgaging 19 kanals in favour of Shershah on 08.08.1885; 68 kanals in favour of Jai Ram on 22.08.1886 and 21 kanals
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.