M. R. SHAH, B. V. NAGARATHNA
Delhi Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Diwan Chand Anand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M. R. Shah, J.
1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order dated 09.07.2007 passed by the High Court of Delhi in RFA No.280 of 2001 and the subsequent order dated 13.01.2012 passed by the High Court in R.P. No.314 of 2008 in the very same RFA No.280 of 2001, the original appellant before the High Court – Delhi Development Authority (‘DDA’ for short) has preferred the present appeals.
2. The facts leading to the present appeals in a nutshell are as under:
The two plaintiffs, namely, Shri Diwan Chand Anand and Smt. Chanan Kanta Anand claiming to be the co-owners of the suit property filed the suit before the Civil Court/learned Trial Court for declaration and permanent injunction. The suit was filed challenging the acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). In the plaint defendant nos. 8 to 39 were impleaded alleging to be co-shares as proper parties to the suit. The original plaintiff no.2, Smt. Chanan Kanta Anand, was the wife of original defendant no.8 – Shri Dharam Chand Anand. On the demise of the husband and wife (original plaintiff no. 2 & defendant no. 8) their children were substituted both as
A. Viswanatha Pilliai and others vs. The Special Tehsildar for Land Acquisition No.4 and others
Esha Bhattacharjee vs. Managing Committee of Ragunathpur Nafar Academy and others
K. Vishwanathan Pillai versus Special Tehsildar for Land Acquisition No.IV
Sardar Amarjit Singh Kalra vs. Pramod Gupta
State of Bihar vs. Dharender Kumar
Sunkara Lakehminarassama vs. Sagi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.