SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 585

INDIRA BANERJEE, A. S. BOPANNA
Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Telangana – Appellant
Versus
B. Rangaswamy (Dead) By Lrs. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, Sr. Adv. Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv. Mr. P. Venkat Reddy, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kr. Tyagi, Adv. Mr. P. Srinivas Reddy, Adv. M/s. Venkat Palwai Law Associates, AOR SLP 7610/2021 Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Annam Venkatesh, AOR Mr. Rahul Mishra, Adv. Ms. Ananya Khandhelwal, Adv. Ms. Agrimaa Singh, Adv. Mr. D. Shiva Shankar, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sureni Bhagat, Adv. Mr. Rahul Narayan, AOR Mr. Dharmesh DK Jaiswal, Adv. Mr. Shashwat Goel, Adv. Mr. Sameer Kumar, AOR Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Somanadri Goud Katam, AOR Mr. Nitin Thakral, Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, AOR Ms. Samten Doma, Adv. Mr. Sourabh Tandon, Adv. Mr. Shekhar Kumar, AOR

JUDGMENT :

A.S. Bopanna, J.

Leave granted.

2. The Appellants-State of Telangana through its Principal Secretary as appellant No.1 and District Collector as appellant No.2 are before this Court in the Appeal bearing No.4669/2022 (arising out of SLP 6898/2021), assailing the judgment dated 01.04.2021 passed by High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad in CCCA No.22/1999. The appellant in Appeal No. 4670/2022 (arising out of SLP No.7610/2021), is also assailing the same judgment insofar as cancellation of a portion (298 sq.yards) of the suit subject land allotted in his favour. The consequence of the result of the main appeal will befall on the appellant in the said appeal, due to which there is no need to consider the same in detail.

3. Through the judgment dated 01.04.2021 the High Court has allowed the appeal and set aside the judgment and decree dated 10.11.1998 passed by the V Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in O.S. No.609/1981. Consequently, the suit has been decreed declaring the respondents in the main appeal as owners and restraining the appellants herein from interfering with their possession. The appellant in the connected appeal has been directed to re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top