UDAY UMESH LALIT, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
Rameshwar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. clarification of previous judgment on land acquisition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. nature of 'transfer' in land acquisition context. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. consequences of fraudulent land transfers. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. collaboration agreements and development rights discussed. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. compensation frameworks in specified scenarios. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. distinction for bona fide landowners or purchasers. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. challenges in verifying land ownership claims. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. standards for allottees in commercial developments. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 9. final observations affecting future rights and obligations. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 10. instructions for hsiidc and land management. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
JUDGMENT
S. Ravindra Bhat, J.
INDEX
| Background | |
| I. Applications filed by: | |
| (a) M/s. Paradise Systems Pvt. Ltd. | |
| (b) M/s. Karma Lakelands Pvt. Ltd. | |
| (c) Frontier Home Developers Pvt. Ltd | |
| (d) Analysis and conclusion of I (a) (b) and (c) | |
| II. Applications filed by: | |
| (a) M/s. R.P. Estates Pvt. Ltd and M/s. Subros Ltd | |
| | |
Ashis Mukerji v. Union of India
Ashok Kumar Jaiswal v. Ashim Kumar Kar
B. Gangadhar v. B.G. Rajalingam
Faqir Chand Gulati v. Uppal Agencies Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Rameshwar & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Sushil Kumar Agarwal v. Meenakshi Sadhu & Ors.
Swadesh Ranjan Sinha v. Haradeb Banerjee
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.