Nemai Chandra Kumar (D) Thr. Lrs. vs Mani Square Ltd.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 678

A. M. KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI
Nemai Chandra Kumar (D) Thr. Lrs. – Appellant
Versus
Mani Square Ltd. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Pranaya Goyal, Chanchal Kumar Ganguli, Madhumita Bhattacharjee, Anant, Shekhar Kumar, Advocates.

Table of Content
1. appeal against high court judgment regarding thika tenancy. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court analysis of statutory provisions relevant to thika tenancy. (Para 4 , 12 , 14)
3. findings and reasoning of the controller. (Para 10 , 11)
4. arguments by parties regarding the nature of tenancy. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
5. court's reasoning on the statutory scheme and amendments. (Para 22 , 26 , 30)
6. final conclusions on thika tenancy status and appeal outcome. (Para 28 , 29)

JUDGMENT :

Dinesh Maheshwari, J.

	Table of Contents
Preliminary
Statutory Provisions
Background and Factual Matrix
Findings and conclusion of the Controller
Findings of the Tribunal
Findings of the Calcutta High Court
Previous decision of this appeal and review thereof
Rival Contentions
The Appellants
The State
The respondent No. 1
Analysis
The Structure in question
The statutory scheme and the import of three enactment with their amendments
The relevant decisions of Calcutta High Court
Other mis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(SC) 678

A. M. KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARINemai Chandra Kumar (D) Thr. Lrs. – AppellantVersusMani Square Ltd. – Respondent

Cases Referred (17)

A. M. KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI
Nemai Chandra Kumar (D) Thr. Lrs. – Appellant
Versus
Mani Square Ltd. – Respondent