SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 686

AJAY RASTOGI, B. V. NAGARATHNA
Harsh R. Kilachand – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ms. Meenakshi Arora

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. The present appeal has been preferred for quashing of the FIR No. 17 of 2022 dated 24.2.2022 registered with Police Station Mukteshwar, District Nainital, Uttarakhand for the offence punishable under section 420 IPC.

3. We have heard Ms. Meenakshi Arora, learned senior counsel for the appellants and with her assistance have gone through the various orders passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court disposing of the criminal writ petition in a cyclostyled manner.

4. Prima facie, we are of the view that while passing these orders, the learned Judge has not taken pains to look into the merits of the matter and has passed cyclostyled orders.

5. Learned counsel for the appellants, on instructions, submits that the counsel for the appellants before the High Court tried to persuade the Court to appreciate the facts on merits for quashing of the FIR in regard to which the complaint was made but the order impugned dated 4.4.2022 does not disclose even the bare facts for appreciation and this is the reason for the appellants to approach this Court by filing this appeal.

6. In our considered view, the manner in which the order impugned dated 4.4.2022 has been p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top