SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 753

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K.M. JOSEPH, HRISHIKESH ROY, JJ.
The State Of Rajasthan & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
Anju Rini Saini - Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 872 of 2022(Arising out of SLP (C)No. 10551 of 2021)
Decided on : 02-02-2022

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the respondent, as a widow, was not eligible to be considered for appointment as a Lower Division Clerk (LDC) as she did not possess the essential qualification (RSCIT) on the last date of application or till the extended date. The court also clarified that the provisions of Rule 266-A of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996, did not apply to the case as the respondent was never appointed to the post in question to clothe her with a right under the rule.

Headnote:

RSCIT - Appointment of Lower Division Clerk (LDC) - Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 - Rule 266-A - The court discussed the provisions of Rule 266-A of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996, which provides for the regularization of widows/divorcees who have been given appointment after relaxing the required educational qualification. The court highlighted that the rule does not apply to the case as the respondent was never appointed to the post in question to clothe her with a right under Rule 266-A. The court also emphasized that the qualifications subject matter in the rule are different from the qualification in question, RSCIT. The court found that the respondent was not eligible to be considered for appointment when the notification was issued in 2017, as she did not possess the essential qualification (RSCIT) on the last date of application or till the extended date.

Fact of the Case:

The respondent, a widow, applied for the post of Lower Division Clerk (LDC) but did not possess the required qualification of Rajasthan State Certificate in Information Technology (RSCIT) by the last date of submission of the application. She obtained the qualification later and sought inclusion in the document verification for LDC Recruitment 2013. The application was disapproved, leading to the filing of a writ petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the respondent was not eligible to be considered for appointment as she did not possess the essential qualification (RSCIT) on the last date of application or till the extended date. The court also emphasized that the provisions of Rule 266-A of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996, did not apply to the case as the respondent was never appointed to the post in question to clothe her with a right under the rule.

Issues: The main issue was whether the respondent, a widow, could be considered for appointment as a Lower Division Clerk (LDC) despite not possessing the essential qualification (RSCIT) on the last date of application or till the extended date.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the respondent was not eligible to be considered for appointment as she did not possess the essential qualification (RSCIT) on the last date of application or till the extended date. The court also emphasized that the provisions of Rule 266-A of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996, did not apply to the case as the respondent was never appointed to the post in question to clothe her with a right under the rule.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, the impugned judgment was set aside, and the writ petition was dismissed. The court found that the respondent was not eligible to be considered for appointment as a Lower Division Clerk (LDC) and overturned the decision to direct her appointment.

JUDGMENT :

K.M. JOSEPH, J.

Leave granted.

(1) By advertisement dated 15.02.2013, applications were invited for filling up vacancies of Lower Division Clerk (LDC). The requirement was inter alia that the applicant must possess the qualification of Rajasthan State Certificate in Information Technology (RSCIT) by the last date of submission of application notified as 22.03.2013. Reservation was contemplated in the category of women and certain number of posts were set apart for category of widows among women. Respondent being a widow applied for the post of LDC on 15.04.2013. As on the last date prescribed for submission of application, the respondent did not possess the qualification of RSCIT. Request from applicants generally led to the authority taking the decision to extend the period for production till the date when the documents were to be verified or before the preparation of the select list. The respondent did not produce the RSCIT within the extended period which is 07.05.2013. This led to the rejection of her application in the meeting of District Establishment Committee which took place on 28.06.2013. Thereafter, on 10.11.2014, the respondent admittedly obtained the qualification of RSCIT.

Thereafter, it would appear that there was some litigation which stalled the recruitment process.

(2) Later on, in the year 2017, an advertisement came to be issued on 21.08.2017 by which it was decided to proceed with the selection. We deem it appropriate to advert to it:

    “ADVERTISEMENT

    In compliance of Letter No. F37()P.R.D./Pr.-2/L.D.C. Direct Recruitment 2013/17/3263 Jaipur dated 17.08.2017 of the Government Secretary and Commissioner, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department in compliance of various judicial decisions, eligible candidates as per amended merit list of L.D.C. Recruitment 2013, as per meritwise issued earlier and candidates coming in final cutoff of marks obtained categorywise (as per mentioned below) shall remain personally present on 24.08.2017 morning at 09.00AM at Office of Jila Parishad, Dausa by fulfilling detailed application form and attaching their detailed application form, certified copies of their Educational and professional qualification certificates and other necessary certificates and photocopy of online application form along with original documents. In case of being absent it will be assumed that you are not interested in this recruitment. It is the final opportunity, after this no opportunity will be granted for verification of documents. Categorywise cutoff list of marks for L.D.C. Recruitment 2013 is as follows: -

Class

General

General Female

Widow

Abandoned

Ex-Service men

Excellent Player

H.I.

L.D. C.P.

B.L.

General

69.431

66.616

38.662

45.231

26.170

44.046

43.5 08

66.6 16

50.29 2

Other Backward Class

67.040

62.620

26.277

-

Special Backward Class

66.077

62.000

-

-

Schedule Caste

64.160

60.800

-

39.954

Schedule Tribe

65.108

62.416

31.016

40.000

    Note: -

    1. Those candidates who have acquired their professional qualification from any other State/Private University/ Deemed University except RSCIT. They will have to submit affidavit of Rs.100 in prescribed format as per instructions of Department.

    2. Such candidates whose appointment orders have been issued earlier but due to some reasons they could not took work charge. In compliance of Departmental Letter No. 3263 dated 17.08.2017, after re-inspection of their documents and eligibility, final opportunity for taking work charge is given.”

(3) Thereupon, the respondent filed an application on 27.08.2017:

    “To,

    The Chief Executive Officer,

    Jila Parishad, Dausa (Raj.)

    Subject: -For including in Document verification for LDC Recruitment 2013.

    Sir,

    It is kindly requested that I got document verification in LDC Recruitment


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top