SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K.M. JOSEPH, HRISHIKESH ROY, JJ.
The State Of Rajasthan & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
Anju Rini Saini - Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 872 of 2022(Arising out of SLP (C)No. 10551 of 2021)
Decided on : 02-02-2022
RSCIT - Appointment of Lower Division Clerk (LDC) - Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 - Rule 266-A - The court discussed the provisions of Rule 266-A of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996, which provides for the regularization of widows/divorcees who have been given appointment after relaxing the required educational qualification. The court highlighted that the rule does not apply to the case as the respondent was never appointed to the post in question to clothe her with a right under Rule 266-A. The court also emphasized that the qualifications subject matter in the rule are different from the qualification in question, RSCIT. The court found that the respondent was not eligible to be considered for appointment when the notification was issued in 2017, as she did not possess the essential qualification (RSCIT) on the last date of application or till the extended date.
Fact of the Case:
The respondent, a widow, applied for the post of Lower Division Clerk (LDC) but did not possess the required qualification of Rajasthan State Certificate in Information Technology (RSCIT) by the last date of submission of the application. She obtained the qualification later and sought inclusion in the document verification for LDC Recruitment 2013. The application was disapproved, leading to the filing of a writ petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the respondent was not eligible to be considered for appointment as she did not possess the essential qualification (RSCIT) on the last date of application or till the extended date. The court also emphasized that the provisions of Rule 266-A of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996, did not apply to the case as the respondent was never appointed to the post in question to clothe her with a right under the rule.
Issues: The main issue was whether the respondent, a widow, could be considered for appointment as a Lower Division Clerk (LDC) despite not possessing the essential qualification (RSCIT) on the last date of application or till the extended date.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the respondent was not eligible to be considered for appointment as she did not possess the essential qualification (RSCIT) on the last date of application or till the extended date. The court also emphasized that the provisions of Rule 266-A of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996, did not apply to the case as the respondent was never appointed to the post in question to clothe her with a right under the rule.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, the impugned judgment was set aside, and the writ petition was dismissed. The court found that the respondent was not eligible to be considered for appointment as a Lower Division Clerk (LDC) and overturned the decision to direct her appointment.
JUDGMENT :
K.M. JOSEPH, J.
Leave granted.
(1) By advertisement dated 15.02.2013, applications were invited for filling up vacancies of Lower Division Clerk (LDC). The requirement was inter alia that the applicant must possess the qualification of Rajasthan State Certificate in Information Technology (RSCIT) by the last date of submission of application notified as 22.03.2013. Reservation was contemplated in the category of women and certain number of posts were set apart for category of widows among women. Respondent being a widow applied for the post of LDC on 15.04.2013. As on the last date prescribed for submission of application, the respondent did not possess the qualification of RSCIT. Request from applicants generally led to the authority taking the decision to extend the period for production till the date when the documents were to be verified or before the preparation of the select list. The respondent did not produce the RSCIT within the extended period which is 07.05.2013. This led to the rejection of her application in the meeting of District Establishment Committee which took place on 28.06.2013. Thereafter, on 10.11.2014, the respondent admittedly obtained the qualification of RSCIT.
Thereafter, it would appear that there was some litigation which stalled the recruitment process.
(2) Later on, in the year 2017, an advertisement came to be issued on 21.08.2017 by which it was decided to proceed with the selection. We deem it appropriate to advert to it:
“ADVERTISEMENT
In compliance of Letter No. F37()P.R.D./Pr.-2/L.D.C. Direct Recruitment 2013/17/3263 Jaipur dated 17.08.2017 of the Government Secretary and Commissioner, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department in compliance of various judicial decisions, eligible candidates as per amended merit list of L.D.C. Recruitment 2013, as per meritwise issued earlier and candidates coming in final cutoff of marks obtained categorywise (as per mentioned below) shall remain personally present on 24.08.2017 morning at 09.00AM at Office of Jila Parishad, Dausa by fulfilling detailed application form and attaching their detailed application form, certified copies of their Educational and professional qualification certificates and other necessary certificates and photocopy of online application form along with original documents. In case of being absent it will be assumed that you are not interested in this recruitment. It is the final opportunity, after this no opportunity will be granted for verification of documents. Categorywise cutoff list of marks for L.D.C. Recruitment 2013 is as follows: -
| Class | General | General Female | Widow | Abandoned | Ex-Service men | Excellent Player | H.I. | L.D. C.P. | B.L. |
| General | 69.431 | 66.616 | 38.662 | 45.231 | 26.170 | 44.046 | 43.5 08 | 66.6 16 | 50.29 2 |
| Other Backward Class | 67.040 | 62.620 | 26.277 | - | |||||
| Special Backward Class | 66.077 | 62.000 | - | - | |||||
| Schedule Caste | 64.160 | 60.800 | - | 39.954 | |||||
| Schedule Tribe | 65.108 | 62.416 | 31.016 | 40.000 |
Note: -
1. Those candidates who have acquired their professional qualification from any other State/Private University/ Deemed University except RSCIT. They will have to submit affidavit of Rs.100 in prescribed format as per instructions of Department.
2. Such candidates whose appointment orders have been issued earlier but due to some reasons they could not took work charge. In compliance of Departmental Letter No. 3263 dated 17.08.2017, after re-inspection of their documents and eligibility, final opportunity for taking work charge is given.”
(3) Thereupon, the respondent filed an application on 27.08.2017:
“To,
The Chief Executive Officer,
Jila Parishad, Dausa (Raj.)
Subject: -For including in Document verification for LDC Recruitment 2013.
Sir,
It is kindly requested that I got document verification in LDC Recruitment
AI
The central legal point established is the mandatory consideration of computer qualification obtained in Graduation/B.Ed for LDC recruitment 2013, as specified in the circular dated 26.09.2018.
Point of Law : Division Bench has rightly set aside action of the FCI in rejecting case of original writ petitioner and has rightly directed the FCI to consider the case of original writ petitioner f....
Eligibility for reservations in recruitment must be determined as of the cut-off date for applications, and cannot be changed based on circumstances arising thereafter.
Candidates cannot challenge recruitment criteria after participating in the selection process, as estoppel applies. Eligibility is determined by the employer based on stated qualifications within the....
Adherence to specified deadlines and requirements outlined in the advertisement is crucial for the validity of caste certificates and the selection process.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.