IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
MUNNURI LAXMAN, J.
Saroj Sharma Wd/o Surya Kant – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1919 of 2023
Decided On : 01-12-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to non-consideration for widow reservation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. eligibility change upon husband's death contested. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments favoring retrospective eligibility discussed. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. question on eligibility based on occurred events. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. foundations of eligibility criteria and cut-off dates. (Para 12 , 14) |
| 6. legal precedents support maintaining eligibility date. (Para 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 7. petitioner's failure to meet eligibility criteria confirmed. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 8. writ petition dismissed. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
ORDER :
1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the action of the respondents in not considering her candidature for appointment under the unreserved (widow) category for recruitment to the post of LDC.
2. The facts disclosed that the respondents issued an advertisement for the selection of LDCs vide advertisement dated 12.2.2013. The last date for submitting applications was 22.3.2013. The petitioner applied for the said post on 13.4.2013 under the category of Unreserved Female (General Female). The advertisement provided various reservations, including reservation for widows, and certain posts were earmarked for the Unreserved (Widow) category. The petitioner applied only under the Unreserved (Female) category and did not apply under the Unreserved (Widow) category as she was not entitled to do so. At the time of submitting the application, the petitioner’s husband was alive. Accordingly, the petitioner participated in the selection process for the General/Unreserved (Female) category only and not under the Unreserved (Widow) reservation.
3. During the selection process, the petitioner’s husband passed away on 19.12.2022. In the original selection list, she was not found meritorious either under the Unreserved/General (Female) category or the Unreserved/General (Widow) category. By communication dated 17.11.2022, the respondents decided to fill the unfilled vacancies in the selection process undertaken pursuant to the advertisement dated 12.02.2013. A candidate having 32.846 marks (as shown in Annexure-6) was selected under the Unreserved/General Widow category, whereas the petitioner had secured 52.739 marks. As she had higher marks than the selected candidate under the Unreserved (Widow) category, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 12.01.2023 requesting the respondents to change her category of consideration from Unreserved (Female) to Unreserved/General (Widow). When such a representation was not considered, the present writ petition has been filed.
4. The case of the respondents is that the petitioner had applied under the General/Unreserved (Female) category and was not entitled to avail reservation under the Unreserved (Widow) category as she was not meeting the eligibility criteria on the last date for submitting applications in 2013. Only upon the death of her husband on 19.12.2022, she gained the right to avail reservation under the Unreserved (Widow) category. This right to claim reservation arose subsequent to the last date for submitting applications. The petitioner cannot change her category during the selection process, particularly when she was not eligible to avail such reservation on the last date of submitting the application. Thus, the respondent prayed to dismiss the writ petition.
5. Heard the learned counsel for the for the parties.
6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner had applied under the General/ Unreserved (Female) category, as she did not meet the criteria for availing reservation under the Unreserved (Widow) category because her husband was alive on the last date of the notification, such a beneficial policy ought to be extended to persons who become widows during the selection process due to unforeseen circumstances. Therefore, her category ought to have been changed for consideration under the Unreserved (Widow) category. In support of his case, the lear
AI
Eligibility for reservations in recruitment must be determined as of the cut-off date for applications, and cannot be changed based on circumstances arising thereafter.
Eligibility criteria must be fulfilled by the last date for receipt of applications specified in the advertisement, and no relaxation is permissible for diverting from the terms and conditions of the....
Point of law: if a candidate who secured more marks than the last selected candidate, if a candidate from OBC/BC has secured more marks than the last selected candidate from open category, such candi....
Candidates must provide valid EWS certificates to substantiate claims; failure to do so leads to cancellation of candidature for reserved category positions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the respondent, as a widow, was not eligible to be considered for appointment as a Lower Division Clerk (LDC) as she did not possess the essen....
Reservation for women in job postings requires adherence to merit, enabling candidates from reserved categories to compete for unreserved positions, based on legal provisions stipulated in the Assam ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.