SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 754

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, SURYA KANT, VIKRAM NATH
Subhash – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J.

A. Facts ..............................................................................................................

B. Submissions .................................................................................................

C. Analysis ........................................................................................................

1. Leave granted.

A. Facts

2. These appeals arise from a judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 11th January 2019 in Criminal Appeal No 5307 of 2008.

3. The appeal before the High Court arose from a judgment of the Sessions Judge, Badaun dated 30 July 2008 in Sessions Trial No 499 of 2002, arising out of Case Crime No 61 of 2002 registered under Section 148 and Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code 18601[“IPC”] at Police Station Dataganj District Badaun. The Sessions Judge convicted Rajaram, Rajesh, Subhash, Rampal, Shiv Dayal and Gyanvati for offences punishable under Sections 148 and 302/149 of the IPC. They w


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top