SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 849

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HEMANT GUPTA, VIKRAM NATH, JJ.
Rajbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Punjab – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 2152 of 2010
Decided On : 24-08-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Suryanarayana Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Ms. Jaspreet Gogia, AOR Mr. Karanvir Gogia, Adv.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the prosecution to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt in cases based on circumstantial evidence and poisoning. The judgment emphasizes the need for a complete chain of evidence, exclusion of all reasonable grounds for innocence, and the importance of motive, cause of death, and possession of the poisonous substance.

Headnote:

POISONING - Indian Penal Code 1860 [IPC] Section 302 - [SUMMARY]

Fact of the Case:

The appellant was convicted under Section 302 of IPC for allegedly poisoning the deceased by mixing poisonous substance in the milk. The prosecution alleged that the appellant had a motive to commit the offence to avoid repaying a loan. The deceased's husband filed a complaint stating that the milk brought from the appellant's house caused his wife's death. The prosecution presented evidence of chemical analysis reports and witness testimonies to establish the guilt of the appellant.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the prosecution failed to establish the guilt of the appellant beyond reasonable doubt. The Court noted several weaknesses in the prosecution's case, including doubts about the chemical analysis reports, gaps in the chain of evidence, and inconsistencies in witness testimonies. The Court concluded that the appellant deserved the benefit of doubt and acquitted him.

Issues: The key issues in the case included establishing the guilt of the appellant based on circumstantial evidence, determining the cause of death, and evaluating the reliability of witness testimonies and chemical analysis reports.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court applied the principles of circumstantial evidence and poisoning cases to assess the prosecution's case. It emphasized the need for a complete chain of evidence and the exclusion of all reasonable grounds for innocence. The Court also highlighted the importance of motive, cause of death, and possession of the poisonous substance in reaching a conviction.

Final Decision: The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the judgments of the Trial Court and the High Court, and acquitted the appellant. The appellant's bail bond was cancelled, and sureties were discharged.

JUDGMENT :

VIKRAM NATH, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 29.10.2009 whereby the appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed, confirming the judgment of the Sessions Judge, Bathinda dated 08.04.2005 convicting the appellant under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code 18601 [in short “IPC”] and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months.

2. The prosecution story begins with the lodging of the First Information Report by Joginder Singh (PW-1 husband of the deceased) at Police Station Kotwali, District Bathinda on 18th September, 2000 at 7 P.M. According to the complainant, his son Gursharan Singh in the morning at around 07.45 a.m. brought 1 kg of milk from the house of Rajbir Singh (appellant) who used to reside in the neighbourhood and was carrying on business of dairy farm and selling milk with the help of his wife Sheela. The appellant was known to the complainant being resident of the neighbourhood.

To help the appellant purchase buffaloes and for domestic needs, he had borrowed Rs. 1 lakh from the informant about 7/8 months before. He had also executed a pro-note in that respect. The milk as brought by Gursharan Singh (PW-2) was kept in the refrigerator. At about 12.30 P.M. his wife Kuldeep Kaur @ Bhajno felt hungry and as she was resting due to some uneasiness, the informant himself took out some milk from the jug kept in the refrigerator and after boiling the same gave it to her. After sipping the milk once, she remarked that the milk was bitter in taste and after sipping further, she further remarked that there was some defect with the milk. Then he also smelled the milk lying in the jug from which a pungent smell was coming. In the meantime, his wife felt irritation on her lips and also became restless. He called his son Gursharan Singh (PW-2), who took his mother on his scooter to the Children and General Hospital. He also followed. As the condition of his wife had deteriorated, she was referred to the Civil Hospital, Bathinda where she breathed her last after some time. He further stated in his complaint that he was of the firm belief that Rajbir Singh and his wife Sheela had mixed some poisonous substance in the milk in order to eliminate his family. His wife died because of the poisonous milk. He and his wife were demanding their money from Rajbir Singh but he was making excuses and on account of this grudge he poisoned the milk and hence a report be registered and appropriate action be taken.

3. Dr. K.S. Brar (PW-12), Emergency Medical Officer at Children and General Hospital after examining Kuldeep Kaur referred her to the Civil Hospital considering her serious condition, and also sent information to the police. SI Balwant Singh (PW-7) who was incharge of the Canal Colony Police Post, Bathinda, left for the Children and General Hospital and from there proceeded to the Civil Hospital where the doctor informed him about the death of Kuldeep Kaur. He met Joginder Singh (PW-1) at the Hospital, he gave his statement which was recorded and which after being read over was signed by Joginder Singh (PW-1). SI Balwant Singh (PW-7) made an endorsement on the same (Ex-PA/ 1) for registering the case. On its basis formal FIR (Ex-PA/2) was registered.

4. The inquest report (Ex-PE) was prepared by the Investigating Officer. The dead body was sent for postmortem examination in the custody of Head Constable Kapur Chand (PW-5) and Constable Satpal (PW-10). Necessary police papers were prepared. The Investigating Officer on the next day inspected the place of occurrence, prepared the site plan (Ex-PK). He also collected the sample of milk lying in the jug as also the boiled milk which was lying in the glass. They were packed and sealed. The utensils in which the milk was kept were also taken into custody and a recovery memo (Ex-PM) was prepare


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top