SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 931

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD, HIMA KOHLI, JJ.
The Board of Control for Cricket in India - Appellant
Versus
Cricket Association of Bihar & Ors - Respondents
IA No 49930 of 2020 in Civil Appeal No 4235 of 2014
Decided on : 14-09-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. (A.C.) Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, ASG Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Chadha, Adv. Mr. Tejveer Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Dhawal Mohan, Adv. Mr. Prateek Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Manmeet Kaur Sareen, Adv. Ms. Mitushi Goyal, Adv. Mr. Prabhas Bajaj, Adv. Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv. Mr. S. Uday Kumar Sagar, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Akanksha Mehra, Adv. Mr. Kanu Agarwal, Adv. M/S. Lawyer S Knit & Co, AOR Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan, AOR Mr. Abhishek Singh, AOR Mr. Nirnimesh Dube, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kanu Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR
For IA 133364-65/22 :Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anupam Lal Das, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sukant Vikram, AOR Mr. Rajesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ritu Raj, Adv. Dr. Abhishek Atrey, AOR Ms. Manju Sharma, AOR Mr. Anish R. Shah, AOR Mr. P. Narasimhan, AOR Mr. V. K. Biju, AOR Ms. Celeste Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Akansha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Mohan Babu Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Pd. Goyal, AOR Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mrs. Bina Gupta, AOR Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Nishant Rao, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. R. Chandrachud, AOR Mr. Sarvesh Singh, AOR Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, AOR Mr. Azim H. Laskar, Adv. Mr. Bikas Kar Gupta, Adv. Mr. S.K. Biswal, Adv. Mr. Adtiya Kumar Archiya, Adv. Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, AOR Respondent-in-person Mr. Amol Chitale, Adv. Mrs. Pragya Baghel, AOR Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Amol Chitale, Adv. Mr. Nirnimesh Dube, AOR Mr. Ritesh Kumar Chowdhary, AOR Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR Mr. Santosh Kumar - I, AOR Ms. Liz Mathew, AOR Mr. Raghavendra S. Srivatsa, AOR Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR Ms. Rashmi Singh, AOR Mr. Venkita Subramoniam T.r, AOR Mr. Gagan Gupta, AOR Mr. A.R. Nadkarni, Sr. Adv. Mr. Santosh Mishra, AOR Mr. K. K. Mohan, AOR Mr. Aditya Soni, Adv. Ms. Mamta Singh, Adv. Mr. Amit Singh, Adv. Ms. Parichita Ray, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh, AOR Mr. Sanveer Mehlwal, Adv. Ms. Geetanjali Mehlwal, Adv. Mr. Mohit Yadav, Adv. Ms. Kamakshi S. Mehlwal, AOR Mr. Arjun Garg, AOR Ms. Sonia Mathur, AOR Mr. Snehasish Mukherjee, AOR Mr. Rajat Mittal, AOR Mr. Pai Amit, AOR Ms. Pankhuri Bhardwaj, Adv Mr. Abhiyudaya Vats, Adv Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR Mr. S.Udaya Kumar Sagar, AOR Mr. Nar Hari Singh, AOR Mr. Udayaditya Banerjee, AOR Mr. Neeraj Kumar Sharma, AOR Ms. Charu Ambwani, AOR Mr. Neeraj Shekhar, AOR Ms. Purnima Krishna, AOR Mr. Aditya Ranjan, AOR Mr. Samir Ali Khan, AOR Mr. Kaushik Poddar, AOR Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AOR Mr. Mirza Kayesh Begg, Adv. Mr. Shaddab Anwar, Adv. Mr. Prakhar Srivastav, Adv. Ms. Ayushi Mittal, Adv. Mr. Vipul Abhishek, Adv. Mr. Shekhar G. Devasa, Adv. Mr. Manish Tiwari, Adv. Ms. Thashmitha Muthanna, Adv. Mr. Prashanth Dixit, Adv. M/S. Devasa & Co., AOR Mr. K. Krishna Kumar, AOR Mr. Jayant Mohan, AOR Mr. Gaichangpou Gangmei, AOR Mr. Sridhar Potaraju, AOR Mr. Sandeep Devashish Das, AOR Mr. Deeptakirti Verma, AOR Ms. Anushree Prashit Kapadia, AOR Mr. Divyank Dutt Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Ravi Singh Chhikara, Adv. Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, AOR Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Arjun Singh Bhati, AOR Mr. Kabir Hathi, Adv. Ms. Jesal Wahi, AOR Mr. Ankolekar Gurudatta, AOR Mr. Sahil Tagotra, AOR Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Adv. Mr. Abhivyakti Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Anshuman Ashok, AOR Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, AOR Mr. Saurabh Trivedi AOR Ms. Rachna Gandhi Adv. Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Ronak Baid, Adv. Mr. Khushant Wadhwa, Adv. Mr. Maneesh Pathak, Adv. Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri, AOR Ms. Uttara Babbar, AOR Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, AOR Ms. Shalini Chandra, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Kumar Pandey, Adv. Ms. Sneha Kalita, AOR Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR Mr. Gaurav Sharma, AOR Mr. Rauf Rahim, AOR Mr. Aditya Verma, AOR Mr. M. P. Devanath, AOR Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran, AOR Mr. Rabin Majumder, AOR

The main legal principle established in the judgment is that amendments to a constitution should align with the original purpose and intent of the constitution, ensuring that the amendments do not dilute the underlying objectives.

Headnote:

BCCI - Constitution Amendments - Clause 45, 6(4), 6(5), 14.3, 14.4, 3(b)(vii), 7(3), 15(3), 19(2) - The court approved amendments to the BCCI Constitution, allowing for a cooling off period after two consecutive terms at the same level, and disqualification on conviction of a criminal offence. The amendments were made to align with the original purpose of the Constitution and were accepted by the court.

Fact of the Case:

An interim application was filed seeking the court's leave to give effect to certain amendments to the BCCI Constitution, specifically related to the cooling off period and disqualification criteria for office bearers.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the proposed amendments were in line with the original purpose of the Constitution and accepted the amendments, including the cooling off period after two consecutive terms at the same level and disqualification on conviction of a criminal offence.

Issues: The main issue was whether the proposed amendments to the BCCI Constitution aligned with the original purpose and intent of the Constitution.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the alignment of the proposed amendments with the original purpose of the Constitution, ensuring that the amendments did not dilute the underlying objectives of the Constitution.

Final Decision: The court accepted the proposed amendments to the BCCI Constitution, including the cooling off period and disqualification criteria, as they were found to be in line with the original purpose and intent of the Constitution.

JUDGMENT :

Dr Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J.

1. By the judgment of this Court in Board of Control for Cricket in India v Cricket Association of Bihar, (2018) 9 SCC 624, the draft Constitution of the Board of Control for Cricket in India2[“BCCI”] was approved. The Court stipulated that any amendment to the Constitution shall not be given effect to without the leave of the Court. Clause 45 of the Constitution, as approved, contains the following provision:

“These Rules and Regulations of the BCCI shall not be repealed, added to, amended or altered except when passed and adopted by a 3/4th majority of the members present and entitled to vote at a Special General Meeting of the General Body convened for the purpose or at the Annual General Meeting. Any such amendment will not be given effect to without the leave of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.”

2. On 1 December 2019, certain amendments were approved unanimously at the Annual General Meeting3[“AGM”].

3. An interim application has been filed for seeking the leave of the Court to give effect to the amendments. A reference to the relevant clauses which are proposed to be amended would be necessary.

4. Clause 6(4) of the existing Constitution contains the stipulation that an office bearer who has held any post for two consecutive terms either in a state association or in the BCCI or a combination of both shall not be eligible to contest any further election without completing a cooling off period of three years. During the cooling off period, there is a prohibition on an office bearer becoming a member of the Governing Council or of any committee of the BCCI or of a state association. The rationale for adopting a cooling off period was elaborated in Section C of the judgment of this Court. The rationale was explained in paragraph 35 of the judgment in the following terms:

“… A cooling-off period has several features which are of utmost importance:

(i) it is a safeguard against the development of vested personal interests;

(ii) it ensures against the concentration of power in a few hands;

(iii) it facilitates a dispersal of authority; and

(iv) it encourages the generation of a wider body of experienced administrators.

Cooling-off must be accepted as a means to prevent a few individuals from regarding the administration of cricket as a personal turf. The game will be better off without cricketing oligopolies.”

5. While explaining the proposed provision for a cooling off period after the completion of two consecutive terms, this Court provided the following illustrations:

“However, in our view, it would be appropriate to direct that a cooling-off period of three years would apply after an individual holds two successive terms in office either in BCCI, or in any State Association or a combination of the two. For instance, if an office-bearer has held office for two consecutive terms in any post in a State Association, such an individual must face a cooling-off period of three years. Likewise, if an individual has held any post as an office-bearer of BCCI for a total period of six years in succession, the individual must have a cooling-off period of three years before seeking election again either to BCCI or to a State Association. The cooling-off period would apply also in a situation where an individual holds a post for one term in a State Association followed by a post in BCCI successively or vice versa. This would ensure that after a period of six years involving two consecutive terms, a cooling-off period would be attracted. Allowing an individual to act as an office-bearer for six years in continuation, is a sufficiently long period for experience and knowledge gained to be deployed in the interest of the game without at the same time resulting in a monopoly of power.”

6. An amendment of Clause 6.4 has been proposed on the ground that the BCCI undertakes its activities both at the national and in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top