D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, HIMA KOHLI
Board of Control for Cricket in India – Appellant
Versus
Cricket Association of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dr Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J.
1. By the judgment of this Court in Board of Control for Cricket in India v Cricket Association of Bihar, (2018) 9 SCC 624, the draft Constitution of the Board of Control for Cricket in India2[“BCCI”] was approved. The Court stipulated that any amendment to the Constitution shall not be given effect to without the leave of the Court. Clause 45 of the Constitution, as approved, contains the following provision:
2. On 1 December 2019, certain amendments were approved unanimously at the Annual General Meeting3[“AGM”].
3. An interim application has been filed for seeking the leave of the Court to give effect to the amendments. A reference to the relevant clau
The main legal principle established in the judgment is that amendments to a constitution should align with the original purpose and intent of the constitution, ensuring that the amendments do not di....
The court highlighted the doctrine of proportionality in lifting a lifetime ban on BCCI's office bearer after acceptance of an unconditional apology.
A writ under Article 226 is maintainable against the BCCI, and internal disputes within the BCA should be addressed by the BCCI Ombudsman.
Prior judgments on sports governance do not apply to cricket associations; a tailored framework is necessary for district-level sports governance.
Games/Entertainment - Game of cricket - Jammu and Kashmir Cricket Association - Challenging mandate of CAA in framing Memorandum of Association and Rules and Regulations - BCCI, which is tasked with ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.